yeah, it's not really that kind of completely serious (it's somewhat an competition between two advertising agencies). But it indicates the possible direction of the journey. @Brother shawn: Ahh - yes - everybody has to agree, people should'nt have to be relgious to be able to do bad things! This is for sure (Stalin, Red Khmers, Mao ..) But - in my opinion - relgion helps a lot. It makes it easier to manipulate people, it's like the oil in a cars engine. Even when religious beliefs mixed up with athestic ideology it's like nitro+ glycerine. And i would agree when yous say "Religion in ANY era is easily replaceable by any alternative dogma". But be honest, how often was this the case? Mostly it was something Marxist-Leninistic. The "mixed" ones are more common, people like Adolf Hitler, he comes with things like "Herrenrasse - muster race" as a more athestic ideology (survival of the fittest), he was a catholic (never excommunicated) but he has no problem to mix also "Germanicness-Germanentum" (e.g. using runes like the "SS") even this was not forced by Hitler himself (there were others around him who like the idea to revive the spirit of german cult/gods like odin, thor etc). OK, i'am not a scientist and there is a lot of literature out there about this particular thing like "The Study of Religion under the Impact of Fascism" or "The Occult Roots of Nazism" etc.. Until right know: ISIS - religious?! Politicians (at least here in Germany) says, this has nothing to to with religion. Really? Nothing, maybe a little, because it helps (or what is the reason why these guys sharing out the koran in the shopping areas in bigger towns). What nurtures the hate between people: religion (ok and nationalism, some more ..) this is obvisious and it may bring people to the conclusion that it was not a bad idea to think about ... BTW: thank you Jerry! It was new for me. 1950! Wow.