Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Leslie.m

Full Access Users
  • Posts

    338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Leslie.m

  1. Richard, I like you and respect you from this forum, particularly as you always come across as reasonable and level headed in your comments. If I was ever travelling in your area, I would have reached out to have a cuppa. So I’m going to move on from this part of the topic after asking this: Swop out ties with white shirts in your comment above. How does that play to you? How would that make non-elders and non-appointed brothers feel? What would they be saying to their friends and family in other Congs? None of us are disrespecting the Elders by respectfully asking these questions. We are in a new time - where the Governing Body is now sometimes speaking to everyone - with new direction. It’s not just coming through letters to the Cong like it used to. It’s an adjustment for all of us - and we are all subject to them.
  2. Just came back from touring the Australasia Branch in Sydney. When my friend came by to pick me up - I confirmed whether he had a jacket - he did not. Because of what the update said I asked him to please swing by his place to get his jacket - which he did. He was a little confused though, as he’s from Sydney and he had toured the Branch previously some years ago, without a jacket. We were invited to have lunch at the Branch but couldn’t make it in time due to the jacket detour. When we got to the Branch our jacket less host told us that Australiasia Branch is exempt from the jacket rule due to the heat 🤣🤣🤣. I had informed him we were running late after we picked up the jacket so he waited to let us know when we got there 🤣🤣🤣
  3. Hi @carlos, I get where you're coming from, but "part on the program" has been a standard term amongst Witnesses globally, as evidenced by this quick search in WT Library: https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/s/r1/lp-e?q="part+on+the+program"&p=par&r=occ&st=a If you had told someone you had a part on the program at an Assembly for example, not a single Witness would think you were an attendant or doing A/V.
  4. What would be feeling be if this was the first century and the GB had just announced “no circumsisions required” and the local bodies were saying: yes, but in these and these and these instances they’re still required? The GB has just announced, to everyone, worldwide (not in a letter to the bodies only, not in a congregation announcement only, not even in a video to be shown only in the midweek meeting) that jackets and ties are not required unless you have a part on the program (ie actively giving a talk, doing a demonstration, reading, etc on the stage or platform). What “part on the program” meant was never in question up until the day of the announcement. It still isn’t. What local bodies are doing is in effect saying: The GB doesn’t know best / didn’t think this through completely. Jackets and ties are therefore still required for these and these and these instances. Opinions of bodies are differing not just across different areas or countries, but also for different congs meeting at the same hall. All bodies have good intentions; hopefully they all see the need to “relax” their own rules though…
  5. Wow, that all seems waaaaay more complicated than it should be!
  6. I do appreciate these changes being announced worldwide in an update. Those of us who were privileged to watch the Annual Meeting live felt a bit guilty; and we weren't allowed to discuss parts of it for months afterward - even with our closest friends and family. I understand the important role the AM plays, but I'm all here for the big changes being announced to everyone all at once. I, for one, hope it expands...
  7. They came right out and said they were doing it right here on the forum. What @jwhess said next summarises it best.
  8. Depends on your Body of Elders - some seem to be going “beyond the things that are written” and enforcing jackets and ties for all manner of assignments that have nothing to do with parts on the program…
  9. That was about disfellowshipping… I personally can’t understand why the suit & tie part would need anything further - they were very clear - only if you have a part on the program or are visiting Bethel…
  10. Do we know this for a fact? That branches are sending out guidelines related to the update?
  11. With beards there were no restrictions… this change has platform part restrictions - and as we’ve seen here some BOE’s have added other restrictions as well - carrying mics etc… it creates a bit of uncertainty…
  12. Yes and what’s the view in your locations about attending the Memorial without a jacket or tie. It’s not required anymore, so it’s a personal choice, but it’s a personal choice I think is a bit weird to make (for me, personally).
  13. What’s the feeling about going to the Memorial no jacket / tie / with slacks in your locations? Technically only the 4 or so brothers up on the platform need to be fully suited up, and I was the first to applaud the tie / jacket change for brothers, but it feels weird (for me) even thinking about attending the Memorial without a suit or jacket / tie. Is this akin to first century Jewish Christians feeling weird about eating pork suddenly?
  14. Hopefully a future GB update will correct this “imbalance”. Although some of the older / “set in their ways” brothers are already getting ulcers from the recent pace of changes! 🤣
  15. This 100% makes sense, but is just not done back home at all, unless there wasn’t a single baptised brother available at that time to do the assignment. So a brother coming off the platform from offering the closing prayer and immediately going to the literature counter would not be regarded as “double booked”.
  16. So there wasn’t a “need” in either the Congs I visited or the one I’m in now. At least not by historical standards - there not being a single baptised brother available to do the assignments. Culture / prejudice I understand, which is why I asked if direction had been given…
  17. Was there direction to Elders on this @carlos? It just does not happen at all in my home country - South Africa. I saw this for the first time while travelling through Europe in 2022. When I came back and told some of the Elders in my home cong they were shocked. I saw it again while travelling last year, and I see it’s par for the course in Australia as well… Makes a lot of sense, but I’m wondering why it isn’t better known / adopted worldwide?
  18. Same in English - but some are having trouble parting with their suits! 🤣
  19. In my home country - South Africa, jackets weren’t required for roving mics in some cities, such as Durban - where temps can reach 35 degrees Celsius in summer with 90% humidity, making it feel like 45 degrees… and not all halls have air-conditioning!
  20. At our meeting today, roving mics / AV didn’t have jackets or ties. Platform attendant had both. Hall attendant had a jacket / no tie…
  21. It would be the course of love to correct someone immediately if they are too casual - this will prevent them from continuing to make a wrong judgment and will also “adjust onlookers” so that we all don’t become too casual…
  22. I know you’re not in that situation, but perhaps something to think about / reason on: https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/pc/r1/lp-e/1200271695/5/4 *** w13 6/15 p. 28 par. 17 Let Jehovah’s Discipline Mold You *** 17 Disfellowshipping is another type of discipline from Jehovah. It protects the congregation from a bad influence and can play a role in the sinner’s recovery. (1 Cor. 5:6, 7, 11) Robert was disfellowshipped for nearly 16 years, during which time his parents and siblings firmly and loyally applied the direction in God’s Word to quit mixing in company with wrongdoers, not even greeting such ones. Robert has been reinstated for some years now and is progressing well spiritually. When asked what moved him to return to Jehovah and His people after such a long time, he replied that the stand that his family took affected him. “Had my family associated with me even a little, say to check up on me, that small dose of association would have satisfied me and likely not allowed my desire for association to be a motivating factor to return to God.”
  23. Perhaps a few mentioned to them that older ones / ones with a more restrictive conscience were waiting for GB members / Helpers to grow beards before doing so themselves… Or perhaps, he like how it looked on others in his Cong / HQ / during his travels…

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)