Ben Fenner

I might have...it's called paper. Not making light of difficulties, however the printed word is a bit more difficult to censor once we have it. Unless authorities begin going door-to-door searching for Bibles we will always have God's Word to guide us IF we don't abandon the printed word in favor of only electronic gadgets. Personally I use electronic media only as an occasional convenience, and rely on the hard copy of The Holy Scriptures as my "go to" source of scriptural information.

And if he sits on his glasses he will have 20/20 hindsight!

About the same as this??? (Jeremiah 10:23) 23 I well know, O Jehovah, that man’s way does not belong to him. It does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step.

Now let's say that the government imposes grocery store neutrality and the store with the good food and fair prices must sell you poor food for higher prices to prevent the first grocery store from going out of business? No real difference.

Well it is Saturday and the internet is still running as it should, just like it did for two decades prior to net neutrality. I see nothing wrong with letting a business, in this case an ISP, decide what content they provide and what they will charge for that content. It is called the "free market". If someone doesn't want to pay what the market will bear they are more than free to not pay. That is their choice and they should not feel that gives them the right to whine about not receiving a product they freely chose not to purchase. As for the argument that ISP will either not provide ALL content or "throttle" content that is not their own that is a fallacy argument. I as a business owner should not be forced to provide the competitors product, nor should I be forced to provide the competitors product for a price power than what yields a profit to my business. On a strictly secular view governments have never been able to successfully operate any business.