Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Judge Finds Cop Not Guilty of Assault after Refusing to Watch Video of Assault


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 4179 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

 

A St. Louis cop is caught on video, slamming his forearm across the face of a handcuffed teenage suspect.Rory Bruce not only gets fired for the incident that took place last year, but ended upcharged with assault- something you rarely see happen.

 

However, when Bruce stepped in front of the judge to be tried this week, the judge refused to watch the video that came from a surveillance camera from the back of a police transport vehicle.As a result, Judge Theresa Counts Burke found him not guilty.Judge Burke refused to tell KMOV-TV why she did not want to watch the strongest piece of evidence in the case against the former cop.

But the head of the police union, Jeff Roorda, who is also aMissouri state representative,*fully agreed with her decision not to view the video because he believes videos should only be used to protect police, not hold them accountable.

 

Roorda is now going to help Bruce get his job back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had an elder tell me not too long ago that in the last days we can be sure to see abuse of power never seen before...

 

This one got settled a couple days ago... $6.5 million -

 

 


Edited by Jordan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)