Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Jehovah’s Witnesses and Sexual Abuse: The Court of Brussels Finds the CIAOSN Report Ill-Founded


Recommended Posts

The governmental “cult watchdog” published a text that was methodologically faulty and included false statements, the judge said.

 

https://bitterwinter.org/jehovahs-witnesses-and-sexual-abuse/

 

Another legal victory in Belgium! And this time about a so-called "objective report about (mis)handling of child sexual abuse within the Jehovah's Witnesses".

 

One thing I really appreciate from this court case is the following:

 

In its decision of June 16, 2022, the Court of Brussels sums up the main point of our criticism as follows:

1: “lack of discussion of the methodology;

2: a selective use of a few reliable academic sources;

3: a subjective appreciation of certain beliefs of Jehovah’s Witnesses as peculiar or bizarre, when these beliefs are shared by many Christian denominations;

4: the predominance of newspaper clippings as sources of information, and the omissions and errors that such sources have caused;

5: a lack of contact with the national office of the Jehovah’s Witnesses;

6: the lack of verification of the truth of the allegations;

7: the lack of evidence of an alleged connection between sexual abuse and disfellowshipping of those who report it;

8: the reliance on the controversial Australian Parliamentary Commission’s [Royal Commission] report, whose figures are based largely on unconfirmed allegations of abuse within the family and outside of any institutional context;

9: the reliance on CIAOSN’s biased theory that their dualistic worldview makes Jehovah’s Witnesses an ‘at-risk’ organization, whereas this worldview is shared by most religious communities.”

 

The judge was kind enough to demand from the State the following:

 

"The court ordered “the State to publish, at its own expense, the present judgment on the homepage of the CIAOSN website, for a period of six months from the expiration of a period of eight days from the date of service of the present judgment;” and “to publish a mention of the present judgment with a reference to its full text in the ‘news’ section of the CIAOSN website.”

 

I wonder how many media will pick up this news item

 

Verstuurd vanaf mijn ELE-L29 met Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 22.5.22 (changelog)