Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Class Action Lawsuit against Church, State and Big Pharma is given Green Light


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 4500 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

Class Action Lawsuit against Church, State and Big Pharma is given Green Light

(TORONTO, Canada) - History was made yesterday when the Association of Citizen prosecutors (ACP) headed by Jason Bowman, took the first step towards in exposing Vatican, Crown of England and other parties, and in holding these cartels to account in the Federal Court of Canada.

A Federal Court in Toronto examined Bowman's materials and essentially outlined the framework by which this unprecedented undertaking shall now proceed in Federal Court.

The result granted leave for a full application to be filed, and still provides the applicants with the opportunity to file additional motions for directions if, and as required.

According to Bowman, who acted on behalf of both the ACP and ITCCS,

“We expected to simply file a motion … Instead, the Court directed that we file not only the ex-parte motion materials, but also our entire Application a full week earlier than we were expecting. Naturally, I was elated.”

A crowd of supporters accompanied Bowman to the Federal Court and were present as the Court's outline was explained in great detail.

Afterwards, the group held a press conference nearby and was harassed at least one agent provocateur - a 'blogger' known as "Greg Renouf", who tried to incite violence and discredit both Bowman and ITCCS founder and co-applicant Kevin Annett. Renouf has since then posted a derogatory and untruthful you tube posting about the event.

An attempted live stream broadcast of the event was inexplicably disrupted, although blog media activists who were present reported the news extensively on the internet.

None of the “mainstream” media in Toronto attended the press conference.

The ACP-ITCCS lawsuit is the first of its kind: a class action aimed at so-called heads of state, including the Pope and the Queen of England, on behalf of victims of alleged crimes against humanity committed by churches, governments and corporations.

Also named in this suit as defendants are the government of Canada, the United Church of Canada, the Church of England, and pharmaceutical companies, all of which are charged with crimes against humanity and criminally conspiring to obstruct justice.

Kevin Annett, who is named in the court application as a plaintiff against the Crown, Pope and other defendants, commented,

“As usual, the corporate media ignored us and paid operatives tried to discredit and stop us, but this time, we got our foot in the door of the court system. Wherever that leads us, we’ve taken another step towards forcing criminals in power to do time for their crimes. Whether it’s in this court or in a common law de jure one, the tables will be turned.”

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/july052012/court-church-filing-ka.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but this crowd don't seem legit'. Mainstream media are not covering this by their own admission. Starting a court case is dead easy but making it work is another thing altogether. I would be more convinced of the validity of this case if they came out the 'Judgement' end with good news.

My questions are;

What are the 'crimes'?

How are they linked?

What details will be given in evidence?

Who are the witnesses?

The accusations made here are more 'scatter-gun' tactics and if they had a good case they would not try to put so many varied defendants on the stand.

The Pope, the Queen and CEOs of major corps are all too busy to show up.

They got their 15 mins of fame. 8-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but this crowd don't seem legit'. Mainstream media are not covering this by their own admission. Starting a court case is dead easy but making it work is another thing altogether. I would be more convinced of the validity of this case if they came out the 'Judgement' end with good news.

My questions are;

What are the 'crimes'?

How are they linked?

What details will be given in evidence?

Who are the witnesses?

The accusations made here are more 'scatter-gun' tactics and if they had a good case they would not try to put so many varied defendants on the stand.

The Pope, the Queen and CEOs of major corps are all too busy to show up.

They got their 15 mins of fame. 8-)

I just post em' lady, I don't judge their validity! :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)