Reply from the French brothers to the anti-cult agency

[Jim Jam]

A governmental agency here in France, called the Miviludes (a real pain in the neck), has issued a number of accusations against our Congregation (you know all the classics: "brainwashing", "refusing blood transfusions", "not reporting abuse", etc)

 

Our brothers at the French legal department has dismantled every single falsehood spread by our opposers in a letter that has then been publically available on their official website 

 

Such skillful refutation of false allegations is worth reading:

 

https://temoinsdejehovah.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/Recours-gracieux.pdf

 

All glory to Jehovah 

 

 

Edited 10 hours ago by Jim Jam

[Qapla]

If the letter was in English it might make interesting reading ... especially on an English-speaking forum

[Jim Jam]

6 minutes ago, Qapla said:

If the letter was in English it might make interesting reading ... especially on an English-speaking forum

 

You are right, you can use several methods to translate it

 

Google translate, ChatGPT, Yandex..

Edited 9 hours ago by Jim Jam

[Qapla]

Translating a post/letter from another language to English on an English-speaking forum should be the job of the poster ... not those who may want to read it.

 

5 minutes ago, Jim Jam said:

 

I mean, there's hundreds of methods available to translate it

 

Google translate, ChatGPT, Yandex..

 

Then why didn't you use one of those methods or post a link to one that is already translated?

Edited 9 hours ago by Qapla

[Jim Jam]

because the method I could use might not be each person's favored method so I'm leaving everyone the freedom to chose

 

This is how ChatGPT would translate it for example

 

 

And this is Online PDF Translator

 

 

I don't intend to read it in english so I think it's better to let you chose however you feel is better for you

Edited 8 hours ago by Jim Jam

[dljbsp]

The Google-translated English PDF is mostly accurate in substance, but it is not a reliable legal translation.

It contains structural errors, ordering problems, and several meaning-level distortions that matter if this document is used seriously (legal, advocacy, or credibility contexts).


 

Recours-gracieux Eng.pdf