Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

IRAN seeks peace, and Obama willing to meet w Iran at UN


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 3940 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

http://m.washingtonpost.com/opinions/president-of-iran-hassan-rouhani-time-to-engage/2013/09/19/4d2da564-213e-11e3-966c-9c4293c47ebe_story.html

Hassan Rouhani is president of Iran.

Three months ago, my platform of “prudence and hope” gained a broad, popular mandate. Iranians embraced my approach to domestic and international affairs because they saw it as long overdue. I’m committed to fulfilling my promises to my people, including my pledge to engage in constructive interaction with the world.

The world has changed. International politics is no longer a zero-sum game but a multi-dimensional arena where cooperation and competition often occur simultaneously. Gone is the age of blood feuds. World leaders are expected to lead in turning threats into opportunities.

The international community faces many challenges in this new world — terrorism, extremism, foreign military interference, drug trafficking, cybercrime and cultural encroachment — all within a framework that has emphasized hard power and the use of brute force.

GALLERY

The Right’s 25 most influential, from Townhall.com: The conservative website’s latest listing of the most prominent voices on the right, with a few names you may not know.

We must pay attention to the complexities of the issues at hand to solve them. Enter my definition of constructive engagement. In a world where global politics is no longer a zero-sum game, it is — or should be — counterintuitive to pursue one’s interests without considering the interests of others. A constructive approach to diplomacy doesn’t mean relinquishing one’s rights. It means engaging with one’s counterparts, on the basis of equal footing and mutual respect, to address shared concerns and achieve shared objectives. In other words, win-win outcomes are not just favorable but also achievable. A zero-sum, Cold War mentality leads to everyone’s loss.

Sadly, unilateralism often continues to overshadow constructive approaches. Security is pursued at the expense of the insecurity of others, with disastrous consequences. More than a decade and two wars after 9/11, al-Qaeda and other militant extremists continue to wreak havoc. Syria, a jewel of civilization, has become the scene of heartbreaking violence, including chemical weapons attacks, which we strongly condemn. In Iraq, 10 years after the American-led invasion, dozens still lose their lives to violence every day. Afghanistan endures similar, endemic bloodshed.

The unilateral approach, which glorifies brute force and breeds violence, is clearly incapable of solving issues we all face, such as terrorism and extremism. I say all because nobody is immune to extremist-fueled violence, even though it might rage thousands of miles away. Americans woke up to this reality 12 years ago.

My approach to foreign policy seeks to resolve these issues by addressing their underlying causes. We must work together to end the unhealthy rivalries and interferences that fuel violence and drive us apart. We must also pay attention to the issue of identity as a key driver of tension in, and beyond, the Middle East.

At their core, the vicious battles in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria are over the nature of those countries’ identities and their consequent roles in our region and the world. The centrality of identity extends to the case of our peaceful nuclear energy program. To us, mastering the atomic fuel cycle and generating nuclear power is as much about diversifying our energy resources as it is about who Iranians are as a nation, our demand for dignity and respect and our consequent place in the world. Without comprehending the role of identity, many issues we all face will remain unresolved.

I am committed to confronting our common challenges via a two-pronged approach.

First, we must join hands to constructively work toward national dialogue, whether in Syria or Bahrain. We must create an atmosphere where peoples of the region can decide their own fates. As part of this, I announce my government’s readiness to help facilitate dialogue between the Syrian government and the opposition.

Second, we must address the broader, overarching injustices and rivalries that fuel violence and tensions. A key aspect of my commitment to constructive interaction entails a sincere effort to engage with neighbors and other nations to identify and secure win-win solutions.

We and our international counterparts have spent a lot of time — perhaps too much time — discussing what we don’t want rather than what we do want. This is not unique to Iran’s international relations. In a climate where much of foreign policy is a direct function of domestic politics, focusing on what one doesn’t want is an easy way out of difficult conundrums for many world leaders. Expressing what one does want requires more courage.

After 10 years of back-and-forth, what all sides don’t want in relation to our nuclear file is clear. The same dynamic is evident in the rival approaches to Syria.

This approach can be useful for efforts to prevent cold conflicts from turning hot. But to move beyond impasses, whether in relation to Syria, my country’s nuclear program or its relations with the United States, we need to aim higher. Rather than focusing on how to prevent things from getting worse, we need to think — and talk — about how to make things better. To do that, we all need to muster the courage to start conveying what we want — clearly, concisely and sincerely — and to back it up with the political will to take necessary action. This is the essence of my approach to constructive interaction.

As I depart for New York for the opening of the U.N. General Assembly, I urge my counterparts to seize the opportunity presented by Iran’s recent election. I urge them to make the most of the mandate for prudent engagement that my people have given me and to respond genuinely to my government’s efforts to engage in constructive dialogue. Most of all, I urge them to look beyond the pines and be brave enough to tell me what they see — if not for their national interests, then for the sake of their legacies, and our children and future generations."

more interesting articles:

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/323419-white-house-obama-willing-to-meet-rouhani-at-un

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today is the 68th annual meeting of nations at UN. Iran & US expected to "thaw" relations. Even a "handshake would be groundbreaking".

There is also supposed to be talk of a new "groundbreaking" deal between Israel and Palestine.

Lots of peaceful talking going on.

 I see alot of peacefull talking going on too. I hope none of Jehovah's people get caught off guard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I heard that the President of the U.S., called the President of Iran and they spoke.  The President of U.S. wants a deal with Iran.  Iran is stalling for time to build its nuclear bomb.  According to Fox News, and MSNBC and other news networks, Israel is left without any defense or protection from its (supposed) Allie. the U.S. and the Western world.   So lets just see where all of this goes...along with Syria and its Chemical weapons and the U.N.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.globalresearch.ca/cnns-fake-translation-of-iran-president-rouhanis-statement-regarding-holocaust/5351715?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cnns-fake-translation-of-iran-president-rouhanis-statement-regarding-holocaust

 

Interesting to observe views from multiple sides of an issue, isn't it?  Jehovah has lovingly forewarned us of the agendas of this system so that we are not swayed to one side or the other because all sides make up the same entity, this system under demonic influence and control.

 

Agape'

 

Lin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/syrias-assad-to-comply-with-weapons-clean-up/story-e6frg6so-1226729722892

 

......"In his first comments since the resolution was passed on Friday, Assad told Italy's Rai News 24 television his regime "will comply" with the resolution.

"Of course we will comply with it, and history proves that we have always honoured all treaties we have signed," he said, according to the state news agency SANA.

Assad also said warming relations between the United States and Syria's ally Iran could be beneficial for Damascus and the region, "so long as the United States is honest".

But he said that most European countries "are unable" to play a role in the much-delayed peace conference on Syria which is being planned for mid-November in Geneva.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon pressed for the conference in his first meeting on Saturday with Syria's opposition National Coalition chief Ahmad Jarba, who said he was ready to send a delegation to the conference, a UN spokesman said.".....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-24/syria-is-world-s-biggest-peace-security-challenge-ban-says.html Syria Is ‘World’s Biggest Peace, Security Challenge,’ Ban Says

"Calling Syria’s civil war the world’s “biggest peace and security challenge,” United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said the international community must destroy President Bashar al-Assad’s chemical weapons stockpile and stop the flow of arms to all parties.

Those who used chemical weapons in the conflict must be brought to justice “either through referral to the International Criminal Court or by other means consistent with international law,” Ban said in opening remarks to the UN General Assembly’s general debate.

Ban cited the need for a diplomatic resolution to the 2 1/2-year conflict, saying a “military victory is an illusion.”

Ban urged Assad’s government to grant more access for humanitarian aid workers and to “end the unconscionable targeting of medical facilities and personnel.”"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)