Leaderboard

As I mentioned on last night's chat, "they" does not always mean it is some nefarious attempt to spread hearsay or half-truths. It's just because the sentence simply does not specify who it is that's really saying it. Take, for example, what Jesus said in Luke 12:20. He was telling us that a certain man was dreaming in his mind about getting more and more rich, but died that very night. The way it is expressed was, "Unreasonable one, this night they are demanding your life from you." (In French, the footnote renders it, "one will claim back your life.") Who is "they" in this sentence? It is not just giving weight to an idea without requiring proof, it's a way of expressing that our life is very short and uncertain, a general truth that we all know. But generally speaking, yes, the one stating it could indeed be covering for the fact he has no proof to back up what he is saying. But fortunately, my hand is not bigger than my face.

Us is them and we be they, so be careful what you say.

So, hay is for horses......and for people that grab your arm and won't let go.....HEY! 😎🤣

"Anyone remember this classic?" Yes, but I try not to.

No one would pose for me . . .

I loved that movie!

I went to see Them when it came out in the 50s at the New Mission Theater in San Francisco on Mission Street. Oh, the popcorn and Junior Mints were great. If I remember correctly, the admission was $0.50, and a Seven-Up bottle cap. Whenever the ants appeared, I covered my head with my coat. 🫣🤣

Anyone remember this classic?

'They' always want to give free advise. You know what free is worth!

Here's an interesting fact for anyone who loves to take care of their health: The National Library of Medicine has a study published about the benefits of eating it. So next time I go to an Asian market, I'll definitely be trying this stinky delicious fruit Jehovah gave us! Thanks for sharing this!

SHHH I seriously have that blog written.

I also find this little organ amazing. The gall bladder works with neighbouring organs, such as the liver and pancreas (and also the connecting portal vein responsible for the gastrointestinal tract). When the gallbladder is backed up, the partnering enzyme released from the pancreas into the duodenum can also be affected. This dysfunction can cause inflammation also to the pancreas. There is a need for organs to work well together. Just like Eph.4:16 mentions the need for the body to work harmoniously and not independently from one another, and how this helps the body and the congregation to function.

These creatures are indeed very shrewd

Although not seemingly related - this scale and the threshold under an outside door do have something in common. Modern door thresholds often have a sealing strip, often made of rubber, that fits into two grooves in the wood or metal to seal the airgap when the door is closed. Prior to a built-in strip, door thresholds usually had a raised portion that the door rested against, and the sealing strip was either non-existent or was fastened to the threshold after installation as an add-on piece. While there's not much information about who invented the door threshold with the rubber strip but, here's an interesting tidbit - a man who installed doors thought there had to be a better, easier way to seal a threshold for wooden doors and thresholds. He came up with the idea of cutting two parallel grooves along the threshold and inserting a curved piece of rubber in those grooves. That way, the threshold could be completely underneath the door and still seal the airgap. The idea worked and he later sold the idea and patten to a manufacturer. He became a millionaire and the door threshold with a built-in rubber strip is still used today. Now, what connection does that have with the scale in this thread ... and how do I know this elusive history? I know the story because than man was our Brother! He lived in Orlando and one of his nephews was in a local congregation to me. I heard the story from the inverter himself - and since he was a JW serving in the congregation, I never doubted it. Sadly, both of those fine brothers are waiting for the New System by means of the resurrection. Their last name was Richter.

Another plant that comes to mind, though not a food/fruit bearing plant, is bamboo ... Bamboo is a giant grass that can resemble a tree because of its size.

Very interesting. Japan has its own scale - the Shindo scale - that measures effect rather than energy released. From https://www.japantimes.co.jp/japan-disaster-information/shindo-seismic-intensity/ “The Japan Meteorological Agency has a unique seismic scale called shindo that measures the degree of shaking in the event of an earthquake. This set of numbers — ranging from 0 to 7 — is different from an earthquake’s magnitude, which is a numerical value reflecting the size or energy of the temblor at its source. The shaking and effects become greater as the number increases, with shindo 5 and 6 further divided into lower and upper levels. At maximum 7, people cannot stay standing and may be thrown into the air, while unsecured pieces of furniture are likely to topple over or be tossed up in the air and reinforced concrete walls may collapse. At the seismic intensity of upper 5, people find it difficult to move and dishes could fall out from cupboards. Lower five may cause hanging objects to swing violently. The agency defines level 4 as being felt by most people even if they are walking and likely to awake people who are sleeping. It causes hanging objects to swing significantly. Level 3 can be felt by most people who are staying still and likely to make plates in cupboards rattle. Many people who are not moving around can feel shindo 2 quakes, which will make hanging objects swing slightly, while only some people staying put may feel slight movement in level 1. Zero intensity is detected by seismometers but not perceptible to people. The Great East Japan Earthquake on March 11, 2011, which spawned the giant tsunami that triggered the Fukushima nuclear disaster, was felt nearly nationwide. The shindo readings ranged from 7 in part of Miyagi Prefecture and upper 5 in parts of Tokyo to a barely perceptible 1 in Kyushu.”

https://measuringly.com/how-long-is-150-feet/ 9 Parking Spaces I have been to a durian orchard and it's a awesome sight looking at those tall trees leaden with thorny fruits of such indescribable taste. But being hit by a falling fruit would incur some serious injuries. Some put nets to catch any ripe durians.

I love milk, but as I got older, it started to bother me..Now I am lactose intolerant and use the Lactaid..it's just not the same..🙄

Gallbladder and Biliary Tract: Anatomy

Yes, I agree. Love the way you put your research across. It’s always very interesting and gives us another whisper of a clue about how magnificent our Creator really is.

Super good Creation entry David, thank you! Very enjoyable reading ... relaxing, soothing, calming spiritual gem to contemplate.

Thank you, dear Brittany, for the very good, accurate summary of this organ work. The lovely reference to the biblical advice for cooperation among brothers is also very helpful and important. Through these connections and the reference to them, you can have a very beneficial effect. Carry on Sis.

Added Correction. Thank you!! This is not the correction, but my researched reasoning on the correction. 1. The FDA’s Statement vs. Reality The FDA announced in February 2024 that manufacturers have ceased selling grease-proofing agents containing certain PFAS for food packaging in the U.S. However, this does not mean that PFAS-containing packaging has disappeared entirely. Since PFAS chemicals are persistent, existing stockpiles and previously manufactured packaging could still be in circulation. Additionally, the FDA’s announcement does not specify enforcement measures, meaning companies may still be phasing out materials they already have on hand or addressing broader concerns about PFAS in their packaging. 2. Why Are Companies Setting a 2025 Goal? If the FDA claims these chemicals are no longer being sold, why are companies like McDonald’s and Chipotle still aiming for a 2025 phase-out? Several factors explain this: • Depleting Existing Stock – Large corporations plan years in advance, and supply chains don’t shift overnight. Companies likely need time to exhaust their current inventory of packaging. • Securing Alternatives – PFAS-free packaging must still meet performance, regulatory, and cost requirements, which takes time to test and implement across thousands of locations. • Contractual and Legal Considerations – Many corporations have long-term agreements with suppliers, and sudden changes could create legal or logistical challenges. • Corporate Accountability – If McDonald’s and Chipotle had previously committed to a 2025 timeline, abruptly changing their public stance to “we’ve already eliminated it” would require corporate audits, transparency reports, and potential liability if any PFAS-containing packaging is still found in circulation. Companies are cautious about making claims that could lead to backlash or legal scrutiny. In summary, while the FDA’s announcement signals progress, the reality is that PFAS in food packaging hasn’t disappeared overnight. The 2025 phase-out ensures a complete transition while addressing logistical and legal considerations.

Oh David, if we didn’t have the truth…… 🤢 We are just so so sick of this awful system, literally and philosophically. But just knowing this system is now in the dregs stage, we can all endure just a little bit longer despite these unidentified illnesses we carry. Our work keeps us focused on the end game, the bigger picture, so we can keep going with Jehovah’s help (Phil 4:13 For all things I have the strength through the one who gives me power). What I’ve done recently is throw out all non-stick cookware and I’m using ceramic based ones. Again thanks for the info!

Had no idea about thongs in Australia. 😅 Canadian here, but I have never heard of biffy. Must be a regional term or something from the past…but my fellow Canadians can clarify.🙃 I am losing my English here in Germany, but for washrooms, it is quite normal to address them as toilet, instead of any descriptive words about it. So it’s quite normal to say to “go to the toilet“, or “where is the toilet“? It sounds a bit too direct if you grew up referring to it as washroom, restroom or bathroom. It‘s like saying “I am going to the can“, which is a funny phrase in itself.

Don't forget that the English spell things differently than American do. It's Favourite instead of favorite, it's colour instead of color. The English need to remember, it's not all about U.