Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Linguistically Speaking


Recommended Posts

 I do notice it a bit when professionals, politicians, and celebrities misuse/ mispronounce language. English is difficult to learn and could be hindered by errors in the media. 

Mispronunciation- prolly for probably, krect for correct.

Misuse - the word "way" is a noun, not an adverb; examples- "the way" - "a way." I just read a grocery advertisement that stated its prices were way cheaper. 

Here's a couple of newspaper Headlines:

From a report in a  local paper about the average age of the people in that area, "COUNTY RESIDENTS GROWING OLDER."  It was hardly a surprise!

As a young journalist in middle school, (without editing privileges,) I was taken aback by this headline:"Twenty Odd Teachers Participate In Fashion Show." Wish I still had that paper. 

                                                                                                            Y(Glamma loves Grammar)S

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear ya. (<-- good grammar) I see it too in Canadian media, although I can't think of an example at the moment.

 

French is my second language. I learned it through a course offered by the Society years ago to pioneers wanting to serve where the need was greater (as it was in those days) in French territory. And since I learned proper grammar with it, I can sometimes pick out grammatical errors when native French-speaking people are speaking French! Unfortunately, some of it comes from French brothers and sisters. (I try not to make a big deal of it.) But I can frequently see them even in the French newspapers here. :(

 


Edited by Sheep

corrected grammar error
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aussies like to shorten words. 'memba is really remember, sad'ie is Saturday.

Then there are 2 old favourites or mine - Go axe him (for go ask him) - (2) I went to see a Phil-Imm (2 syllable way of saying film)

Queenslanders where I am now like to draw out their vowels and talk slow, very very slowly. (That I can live with)

However they finish with prepositions! Eg.

'It was good but!' (I'm thinking - it was good - but what?)

'We went anyway but!' (Yes.... but what)

So I learned to accept what they say but.

 

 

 

Just Older

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sheep said:

I hear ya. (<-- good grammar) I see it too in Canadian media, although I can't think of an example at the moment.

 

French is my second language. I learned it through a course offered by the Society years ago to pioneers wanting to serve where the need was greater (as it was in those days) in French territory. And since I learned proper grammar with it, I can sometimes pick out grammatical errors when native French-speaking people are speaking French! Unfortunately, some of it comes from French brothers and sisters. (I try not to make a big deal of it.) But I can frequently see them even in the French newspapers here. :(

 

I would never correct anyone's grammar, syntax, or word misuse. A few years ago, A CO was telling about a newly released JW Video. The CO had memorized the intro paragraph and when he recited it, he used a misnomer. The JW Org rarely has a linguistic mistake, but i tuned in on the drama, and the CO had memorized an error. During our new CO's recent visit, he was talking about increasing our faith. "Is your faith scanty? Here's the anecdote." Actually, the correct word was antidote. Anyway, the answer was up-building and offered quite an antidote for scanty faith. 

 

I have considered picking up some paid proofreading assignments, but I am afraid the gigs available might include the reading of questionable material. Print Newspapers do not seem to care anymore about proper grammar or spelling

                                                                                                          Y(still knows how to parse a sentence)S. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never correct anyone's grammar, syntax, or word misuse. A few years ago, A CO was telling about a newly released JW Video. The CO had memorized the intro paragraph and when he recited it, he used a misnomer. The JW Org rarely has a linguistic mistake, but i tuned in on the drama, and the CO had memorized an error. During our new CO's recent visit, he was talking about increasing our faith. "Is your faith scanty? Here's the anecdote." Actually, the correct word was antidote. Anyway, the answer was up-building and offered quite an antidote for scanty faith. 
 
I have considered picking up some paid proofreading assignments, but I am afraid the gigs available might include the reading of questionable material. Print Newspapers do not seem to care anymore about proper grammar or spelling
                                                                                                          Y(still knows how to parse a sentence)S. 

While most newspapers these days no longer care about proofreading since it’s costly and people don’t really want to pay for news, the Governing Body still hires volunteers to do extensive proofreading. Errors still slip through, but they are rare. The proofreaders correct not only misspelled words, but also grammatical errors and accuracy.

🎵“I have listened to Jesus in these troublesome days,

He lights up my path.

As I hear and obey.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought 'way' was an adverb!!

 

way

 adverb

Definition of way (Entry 3 of 3)

1informal
a: by a long distance : to a considerable degree or extent : FARis way ahead of the classsat way in the back row
b: by far : MUCHate way too muchthat's way too expensive
c: VERY sense 1way coolway excited
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tryin'SoHardToBeSpiritual said:

I thought 'way' was an adverb!!

 

I guess it is now. I see from your post that the informal use of 'way' has made its way (noun) into some reference material, (adverbially speaking.)But it is in third place. 

way

 adverb

Definition of way (Entry 3 of 3)

1informal
a: by a long distance : to a considerable degree or extent : FARis way ahead of the classsat way in the back row
b: by far : MUCHate way too muchthat's way too expensive
c: VERY sense 1way coolway excited

Here's another informal word use that is now recognized by some references. "Sneak: past tense "sneaked." On an American TV Show Judge Judy, the judge corrected a litigant who used "snuck." She got letters that some dictionaries now accept past tense of 'sneak" as "snuck" (informally). I guess snuck has sneaked its was into mainstream,  informal American English usage. 

                                                                                                Y (never snuck in anywhere)S


Edited by kejedo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, kejedo said:

Here's another informal word use that is now recognized by some references. "Sneak: past tense "sneaked." On an American TV Show Judge Judy, the judge corrected a litigant who used "snuck." She got letters that some dictionaries now accept past tense of 'sneak" as "snuck" (informally). I guess snuck has sneaked its was into mainstream,  informal American English usage. 

                                                                                                Y (never snuck in anywhere)S

English is capricious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation with your brothers and sisters!


You can post now, and then we will take you to the membership application. If you are already a member, sign in now to post with your existing account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)