Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Scientific American article: How Old Can Humans Get?


Recommended Posts

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-old-can-humans-get/

 

Quote from the article:  "research into hunter-gatherer populations suggests that individuals who escaped disease and violent deaths could live to about their seventh or eighth decade. This means our typical human life span may be static: around 70 years, with an extra decade or so for advanced medical care and cautious behavior."

 

Psalms 90: 10 said the same thing millennia ago.

 

Another quote:  "João Pedro de Magalhães, a professor of molecular biogerontology at the Institute of Inflammation and Ageing at the University of Birmingham in England, thinks humans could live for 1,000 years. He has scrutinized the genomes of very long-lived animals such as the bowhead whale (which can reach 200 years) and the naked mole rat. His surprising conclusion: if we eliminated aging at the cellular level, humans could live for a millennium—and potentially as long as 20,000 years."

 

Only 20,000 years.  They aren't even close.

 

Found another quote (thus the edit)

 

I Wanna Live Forever

If we eliminated aging at the cellular level, humans could live for a millennium—and potentially as long as 20,000 years, says João Pedro de Magalhães, a professor of molecular biogerontology at the Institute of Inflammation and Ageing at the University of Birmingham in England. By examining the genomes of many animals, Magalhães concludes that aging is genetically programmed–a “software” not a “hardware” problem. 


How it might work: Scientists could hypothetically reprogram our cells by tweaking genes that are central to aging. For example, bowhead whales, elephants, rats and many other animals, all have genes that help elongate life by suppressing cancer, or improving DNA repair; perhaps we could use this knowledge to tweak our own aging coding. This would require technology not currently available. 

 

What the experts say: “

If we could redesign our biology to eliminate cancer and evade the detrimental actions of our genetic software program, the health benefits would be mind-boggling,” says Magalhães. 

 


Edited by Witness1970

Added the part about "found another quote"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Witness1970 said:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-old-can-humans-get/

 

Quote from the article:  "research into hunter-gatherer populations suggests that individuals who escaped disease and violent deaths could live to about their seventh or eighth decade. This means our typical human life span may be static: around 70 years, with an extra decade or so for advanced medical care and cautious behavior."

 

Psalms 90: 10 said the same thing millennia ago.

 

Another quote:  "João Pedro de Magalhães, a professor of molecular biogerontology at the Institute of Inflammation and Ageing at the University of Birmingham in England, thinks humans could live for 1,000 years. He has scrutinized the genomes of very long-lived animals such as the bowhead whale (which can reach 200 years) and the naked mole rat. His surprising conclusion: if we eliminated aging at the cellular level, humans could live for a millennium—and potentially as long as 20,000 years."

 

Only 20,000 years.  They aren't even close.

 

Found another quote (thus the edit)

 

I Wanna Live Forever

If we eliminated aging at the cellular level, humans could live for a millennium—and potentially as long as 20,000 years, says João Pedro de Magalhães, a professor of molecular biogerontology at the Institute of Inflammation and Ageing at the University of Birmingham in England. By examining the genomes of many animals, Magalhães concludes that aging is genetically programmed–a “software” not a “hardware” problem. 


How it might work: Scientists could hypothetically reprogram our cells by tweaking genes that are central to aging. For example, bowhead whales, elephants, rats and many other animals, all have genes that help elongate life by suppressing cancer, or improving DNA repair; perhaps we could use this knowledge to tweak our own aging coding. This would require technology not currently available. 

 

What the experts say: “

If we could redesign our biology to eliminate cancer and evade the detrimental actions of our genetic software program, the health benefits would be mind-boggling,” says Magalhães. 

 

Only 20,000? Nah, 20.000 isn't even enough to find a wife, this is too low

(Be careful! The above comment came from a suspicious source, a 20 year old. There's a risk that he is being: Idiot, reckless or stupid)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation with your brothers and sisters!


You can post now, and then we will take you to the membership application. If you are already a member, sign in now to post with your existing account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)