Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

PA Courts Weighing on the Matter on Child Abuse


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Joey said:

I thought our organization reported all  child abusers. 

I don't understand this lawsuit.

I don't understand it either, really. Here's what I do understand: In some US states (Montana, for example), there is a law that exempts the elders from the normal mandatory reporting when someone voluntarily confesses to an elder that he abused a child. But this Pennsylvania lawsuit seems to have something to do with a law similar to Montana's. I'm not sure what the purpose of this exemption is, besides the explained "clergy-penitent privilege".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The relevant sentences in the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Scripturally Based Position on Child Protection leaflet are worded very carefully. It is reported if either local mandatory reporting laws require it, or if a 'judgment call' is made that the minor is deemed to be still in danger.

 

Ergo I understand that:  if no longer a minor, it is not reported; or if they are still a minor, but no longer deemed to be in danger, then - without some other valid reason - it is not reported, with "clergy-penitent privilege" being cited as the reason.

 

The wording says: "When elders learn of an accusation of child abuse, they immediately consult with the branch office of Jehovah’s Witnesses to ensure compliance with child abuse reporting laws. (Romans 13:1) Even if the elders have no legal duty to report an accusation to the authorities, the branch office of Jehovah’s Witnesses will instruct the elders to report the matter if a minor is still in danger of abuse or there is some other valid reason."

 

Where is the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Scripturally Based Position on Child Protection leaflet on the JW.org website?

 

JW.org

> Information for Government Officials [at bottom of page]

> Global Information Brochures

> Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Scripturally Based Position on Child Protection [at bottom of page]

 

https://www.jw.org/en/gov-resources/global-information-brochures/packet-jw-scripturally-based-position-child-protection/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Parale said:

The relevant sentences in the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Scripturally Based Position on Child Protection leaflet are worded very carefully. It is reported if either local mandatory reporting laws require it, or if a 'judgment call' is made that the minor is deemed to be still in danger.

 

Ergo I understand that:  if no longer a minor, it is not reported; or if they are still a minor, but no longer deemed to be in danger, then - without some other valid reason - it is not reported, with "clergy-penitent privilege" being cited as the reason.

 

The wording says: "When elders learn of an accusation of child abuse, they immediately consult with the branch office of Jehovah’s Witnesses to ensure compliance with child abuse reporting laws. (Romans 13:1) Even if the elders have no legal duty to report an accusation to the authorities, the branch office of Jehovah’s Witnesses will instruct the elders to report the matter if a minor is still in danger of abuse or there is some other valid reason."

 

Where is the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Scripturally Based Position on Child Protection leaflet on the JW.org website?

 

JW.org

> Information for Government Officials [at bottom of page]

> Global Information Brochures

> Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Scripturally Based Position on Child Protection [at bottom of page]

 

https://www.jw.org/en/gov-resources/global-information-brochures/packet-jw-scripturally-based-position-child-protection/

 

 

I would just add to that ... each case is different and there isn't a clear cut "policy" that says - if no danger DO NOT report. It is possible that a report may still be made - but perhaps anonymously.

 

To me, this case is about "are they MANDATED to report or not. As there is a "clergy" exemption, it should apply to the elders.

 

IF they are MANDATED then obviously they will report and then they will have to keep some kind of record to show that they have reported. So, do they need to keep a record and what type of record would suffice if someone tried to sue later and say that they didn't report? This lawsuit is just about clarifying things to prevent future lawsuits.

Plan ahead as if Armageddon will not come in your lifetime, but lead your life as if it will come tomorrow (w 2004 Dec. 1 page 29)

 

 

 

 

Soon .....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation with your brothers and sisters!


You can post now, and then we will take you to the membership application. If you are already a member, sign in now to post with your existing account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)