It seems to me that this new-found freedom in dress and grooming has become something of a can of worms. The "acceptable parameters" apparently are very subjective and subject to interpretation, from what I have seen develop in the long term. Is it time for a local needs part or perhaps a Governing Body update on this subject, since it may need to be revisited?
When it comes to dress and grooming, we've always had a lot of leeway, especially among the sisters. As they say, variety is the spice of life, and many of us enjoy a variety of styles and colors in harmony with Bible principles. The world on the other hand has always gone to extremes and excesses, including overly casual and slovenly in dress and grooming.
We used to have a more specific outline of what qualified as unacceptable, acceptable and exemplary, when it comes to dress and grooming within the organization. When it comes to exemplary, we may not have a specific definition, but I think most of us, at least those of us of a certain age, can say we know it when we see it. However, when it comes to acceptable or unacceptable, it seems the line between the two has been blurred almost beyond recognition, or at least moved to a gray area in what we might call the non-judgmental zone.
The churches of Christendom appear to have a no dress-code policy where you're invited to 'come as you are,' which may be necessary in order to get their members to come to church at all and keep the doors open. We make exceptions or allowances for Bible students or visitors in the same way, but hope they will catch on to the decorum and dress appropriately before too long. This is what true worship looks like and I hope we never get to that slippery slope Christendom has gone down in the name of Christian freedom, free will, conscience, personal choice or anything else that could make us visibly indistinguishable from nominal Christians.