Firefox Vs. Chrome

[dove]

What is the advantage of it, because when I right click on the message after reading it I don't want to highlight it. I just want to mark it unread to save it until I am ready to delete it which I do by clicking on the star symbol.  But to undo the highlighting, each time I have to uncheck  the check mark..

 

Okay, before I sent this I went back and found a way to save a message without it highlighting by selecting More at the top and choosing Mark Unread..

 

Thank you for your help..

 

 

[A fellow servant]

Firefox for me

 

[Dages]

Chrome for the sync of the history and bookmark.

Same on mobile but I sometimes use Firefox Focus for one shot use to avoid ads (even if I use DNS66)

And ublock origin is my favorite extension, best anti ad

[Allabord4Jah]

I have a question, I hear and read all this stuff about FCC and Internet.  I have no idea what they are trying to do (FCC). Just exactly is this FCC guy talking about and how will it affect my Internet after Dec 14, 2017? 

[Old]

On 8/11/2013 at 12:12 PM, Dismal_Bliss said:

I am considering #Firefox again and currently testing. I used to be a loyal Firefox user, but when they screwed up royally then #Chrome stole my heart. Now I find Google Chrome having trouble rendering pages correctly and Mozilla Firefox is doing great. A recent #Google search shows that Firefox recently surpassed Chrome in speed and reliability. Hmmmm.

What is YOUR favorite browser, and why?

#GoogleChrome #MozillaFirefox #BrowserWars

 

 

 

Your experience mirrors mine. I was Firefox forever and then..... Switched to Chrome and now it is my habit. I have Firefox installed but have not used it to any degree.

[GeordieGirl]

14 minutes ago, Old said:

Your experience mirrors mine. I was Firefox forever and then..... Switched to Chrome and now it is my habit. I have Firefox installed but have not used it to any degree.

Me too.  I was Firefox for years and then their constant updates with add-ons and extensions not working because of it and each update seemed to cause my system to get slower and slower, I eventually succumbed to Chrome.  I tried Firefox on my tablet but decided to just use Chrome across all my devices and I suppose I'm just used to it now. 

[Myew]

Someone ressed an ancient thread.  Firefox was always my favorite, but I switched to Chrome due to android phone/tablet use, Google docs, and Firefox slowdown with age.
Mozilla just released Firefox Quantum however, and I've heard good things. Worth another try if I ever work up the effort to port everything back over again...

 

1 hour ago, Allabord4Jah said:

I have a question, I hear and read all this stuff about FCC and Internet.  I have no idea what they are trying to do (FCC). Just exactly is this FCC guy talking about and how will it affect my Internet after Dec 14, 2017? 

It's called Net Neutrality. It's all political - we must remain neutral as Christians and not get involved. Basically, the major Cable/Data/ISP companies are lobbying to take control of the (USA?) internet and will have to right to force individual websites and people into low bandwidth/speed unless they pay additional fees in order to force out competition. It's the cable monopolies trying to use their money to once again force their way back into profit rather than fixing the infrastructure or ceasing to exist. If the internet was determined to be a neutral, necessary resource/utility, then all data would be treated equally rather than being charged more to access certain types of data or websites.

[Tortuga]

4 minutes ago, Myew said:

 

It's called Net Neutrality. It's all political - we must remain neutral as Christians and not get involved. Basically, the major Cable/Data/ISP companies are lobbying to take control of the (USA?) internet and will have to right to force individual websites and people into low bandwidth/speed unless they pay additional fees in order to force out competition. It's the cable monopolies trying to use their money to once again force their way back into profit rather than fixing the infrastructure or ceasing to exist. If the internet was determined to be a neutral, necessary resource/utility, then all data would be treated equally rather than being charged more to access certain types of data or websites.

 

Recent news reports have said that it would allow internet companies to restrict access to some sites unless you pay for them. It's compared to cable TV where you have to pay extra to get more channels. The internet provider could create and sell a Sports Web package or a Arts Appreciation package,  whatever they want. You wouldn't be able to access those sites unless you bought the package. 

[Allabord4Jah]

Thank you brothers for the explanination.  I didn't know what all this hoopla was about.  What a Satanic joke!  It makes me think of when Russia banned the Internet and then China followed suit, I guess now it's the USA, going about it with big companies to take over the Internet and they make all the decisions on what you can view or not view, pay or not pay and  not have Internet at all.  My goodness brothers, I can picture that beast in our Revelation book/half lamb and half monster has it claws on every part of this satanic world.