trottigy

That is basically what the US addendum says - no objection to using online storage services for nonconfidential documents. The only confidential item sited is judicial matters. Different countries have different legal requirements for personal information, but most must allow online storage - as Google and Amazon are surely doing that.

The previous verse that cause this verse to start out with "therefore" "Let no man deceive you with empty words, for because of such things the wrath of God is coming upon the sons of disobedience." Does that remind you of 1st Corinthians 15:33 - Do not be misled? Or let no mam deceive you.

I don't think that's how that works or is even close to what the supreme court decision was about.

Maybe Ukraine and Russia (the really big war) can be addressed soon?

That's the US advantage - how far away they are from nations who might attack. There is a lot of time to see missiles coming.

Pain caused by imperfection. Examples of that would be the pain I experience in my left knee due to arthritis. As arthritis will be a thing of the past along with aging - aches and pains from old age will be gone Also emotional and mental pain caused by imperfection. For example, dealing with one of your children having a child out of wedlock. Or them committing a crime and ending up in jail, or any number of things that our loved ones do that cause us pain. Or even dumb thing that we might do due to imperfection and bad choices and the suffering that comes from that (see David).

Halloween 🎃 ?

https://www.wola.org/2025/06/weekly-u-s-mexico-border-update-los-angeles-abrego-garcia-travel-ban-and-parole-termination/ On average only 664 deportations a day so far, but Mr. Miller wants 3,000 - almost 5 times as many. That is going to cause ICE to just arrest everyone they can to meet the quota.

But Paul also baptized Onesimus and he actively helped Paul in his ministry. And we don't know how long Onesimus helped Paul. We don't have to call the branch, we already know how they feel. This Watchtower spells it all out well - https://www.jw.org/finder?srcid=jwlshare&wtlocale=E&prefer=lang&docid=1977211&par=2

A quick look at the headlines shows just how insane the world we live in has become (all from BBC - https://www.bbc.com/😞 1. Austrian school gunman who killed nine was 21-year-old former pupil, officials say Six females and three males are among the dead, the interior minister says, after a local man opened fire in a secondary school in Graz. 2. UK sanctions far-right Israeli ministers for 'inciting violence' against Palestinians Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich will both face a travel ban, the UK says. 3. Middle East Greta Thunberg deported, Israel says, after Gaza aid boat intercepted 4. RFK Jr sacks entire US vaccine committee 5. Trump says LA would be 'burning to the ground' without troop deployment California Governor Gavin Newsom blasts the federal government's response to anti-immigration raid protests as "purposefully inflammatory". Even the book section: 6. How being alone can make you happier From spending time by yourself to making the most of being single, flying solo can be fulfilling – a philosophy championed by a new wave of books. NOTE: that picture is the cover of Frankenstein! The world has gone to the monsters!! May the Kingdom come! And take full control to end the madness.

What if the opposite is true? The Gaza situation and Ukraine war are ended. There is relative peace in the world and during that brief window of finally the dust has settled the nations say – “you know what would prevent the next major one? We could pool all of our armies together under the banner of the UN - INSTEAD of NATO and then things would be “fairer”. There would be “united” front instead of this coalition against that.” Just noting that a huge cataclysm doesn’t have to spark it. It could be the opposite. It could be a quite peaceful opportunity maybe even while the financial markets are also relatively stable – that could cause ones to want that to continue. NOTE: That would make giving power to the UN even more unexpected IMO.

Some have asked if it is ok to quote a paragraph of an article from JW.org. This is not a comment on the intent of the announcement, but is a comment on ALL copyright work (which would include work from JW.org). There is a legal principle known as "fair use" that answers this. This is a summary: Key factors considered in fair use decisions: Purpose and character of the use: Whether the use is for educational, research, or transformative purposes (adding new meaning to the original work). Nature of the copyrighted work: Whether the work is factual or fictional, and the copyright owner's potential market for the work. Amount and substantiality of the portion used: How much of the original work is used, and if it's the "heart" of the work. Effect on the potential market: Whether the use harms the copyright owner's ability to profit from their work. Based on this principle, a quote of a small portion of an article is ok. We ask that you always add a link to the source to verify accuracy.

It isn't in the terms of use. That was just a personal opinion by the poster. Edit: to me this would be a good opportunity to use a link rather than downloading material and attaching it to a message. This would especially be true if these are our brothers and sisters - they know JW.org.

Rather than bogging down this topic with that topic, please refer to the 1975 topic that was posted a while ago, here: There's plenty of information there. I just ask of everyone else, please don't paste about 1975 here.

We have not contacted the legal department, and we have not been contacted. We feel we are following the intent of the “terms of use” and even put the policy mentioned above in place to ensure that the site does as well. As noted, we also moderate the site to the best of our ability to ensure it is followed. There are always numerous opinions about what is right vs wrong, and this is why there are laws and regulations and courts to litigate the exact meaning and intent. We will follow that. That said, if you feel different and it would bother your conscience to even post a link, we are happy to remove whatever you posted that violates your conscience - within reason. You will just need to report each post that is yours and we can handle them one at a time as you report them. This is why the first post I made stated,