Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Pastafarian gets to wear strainer on head in license photo


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 3286 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

http://www.wkyc.com/story/life/2015/11/16/pastafarian-gets-to-wear-strainer-on-head-in-license-photo/75859900/

 

(AP) - A Massachusetts agency is letting a woman who belongs to the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster wear a colander on her head in her driver's license photo after she cited her religious beliefs

Phillipians 4:8 Finally, brothers, whatever things are true, whatever things are of serious concern, whatever things are righteous, whatever things are chaste, whatever things are lovable, whatever things are well-spoken-of, whatever things are virtuous, and whatever things are praiseworthy, continue considering these things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erm...Quite the fashion statement.  :uhhuh:

 

635832586303218816-WireAP-c98b8c9c708645

 

 

Lawyer Patty DeJuneas calls Pastafarianism a "secular religion that uses parody to make its point."

 

Which point must then be that religion, as a whole, is ludicrous? :huh:

Instead of going door-to-door, they go kitchen-to-kitchen.  :D

 Wonder if the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster has a pope? :wacko: ...or a pope-ess? ^_^ 

 

I think Church of the Holy Colander sounds better. 

Bromwell_Colander.jpg^_^

Macaw.gif.7e20ee7c5468da0c38cc5ef24b9d0f6d.gifRoss

Nobody has to DRIVE me crazy.5a5e0e53285e2_Nogrinning.gif.d89ec5b2e7a22c9f5ca954867b135e7b.gif  I'm close enough to WALK. 5a5e0e77dc7a9_YESGrinning.gif.e5056e95328247b6b6b3ba90ddccae77.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which point must then be that religion, as a whole, is ludicrous? :huh:

 

That "religion" is intentionally ludicrous.

 

In Europe this colander thing began as a protest. Some Muslim women refused to take off their veil for their passport pictures and insisted to use pictures where their face appeared completely covered. In a few cases governmental officers accepted this not to hurt religious feelings. So these spaghetti people created their own mock religion and insisted that they had the same right to wear a colander on their head based on the same religious grounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is another symptom of the attack on religion.  People are getting tired of religion, period.  In this case, they are satirizing the idea of religion by forming a "church."  This particular case is an attempt to mock religion and pointing out a perceived absurdity of allowing exceptions based on religion.

 

Further, it shows a lack of concrete thought and understanding on the part of the judges involved in allowing this person to wear a spaghetti strainer in her DMV photo.  Let's stop and think about this for a moment.  Some religions call for the wearing of a particular piece of clothing such as a headscarf.  It is their religious practice.  Individuals that follow such a practice wear a headscarf regularly.  That is the salient difference here.  Regularity in the wearing of the headscarf.  The Pastafarians are mocking religion.  They do not regularly wear a spaghetti strainer.  I would bet this individual only wore the strainer in her DMV photo and nowhere else.  

 

Let's assume this is a legitimate religion that deserves the same treatment as Islam or anything else.  What is the religious teaching of the Pastafarians that requires the wearing of a spaghetti strainer?  What is the doctrine, tenant or teaching?

 

No.  This is satire and mockery being allowed by the government.

Phillipians 4:8 Finally, brothers, whatever things are true, whatever things are of serious concern, whatever things are righteous, whatever things are chaste, whatever things are lovable, whatever things are well-spoken-of, whatever things are virtuous, and whatever things are praiseworthy, continue considering these things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)