Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Obama: The U.S. Will Send 'Clear Message' to Russia on Hacks


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 1968 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

A clear message....?

Is this the same Obama that layed down the law to Syria with a "red line in the sand..." Probably shooting blanks again (Thankfully.)

I know, right! I'm wondering if he's about to change due to 5 weeks left of his presidency and next administration is about to disrupt his legacy! Stare in amazement!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Putin turned Russia election hacks in Trump's favor: U.S. officials

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1441RS




Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

I did some research online... but I'm still trying to figure out how Russia allegedly hacked the election. Can someone help me out.

News sources are saying that due to the sophistication of the "hack" it came from top heavy Kremlin hence Putin

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did some research online... but I'm still trying to figure out how Russia allegedly hacked the election. Can someone help me out.

"Phishing"
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/safety/online-privacy/phishing-symptoms.aspx

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1441RS

What we know about Russia's interference in the US election.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tbs77 said:


"Phishing"
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/safety/online-privacy/phishing-symptoms.aspx

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1441RS

What we know about Russia's interference in the US election.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 

Thanks. So they were sending messages to people encouraging them to vote for Trump?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No the allegations is Russia hacking the DNC and John Podesta and possibly using Wikileaks to disclose campaign strategies... Which allegedly slowed down Democratic and independent voters enthusiam to get the to the polls to vote for Hillary Clinton and other Democrats down the ballot.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk


Link to comment
Share on other sites

what i see is that they are not denying the "truths...huh... i mean hacks" that were uncovered;  they are just trying to switch the blame and attention away from the "truths".   If trump lost and he did this he would be laughed at.

humm.. wonder if i'm nuetral saying that......:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the accusations that Russia hacked the election is more of an inference than a fact:

The FBI isn't buying the "fuzzy and ambiguous" assertions from the CIA that Russia "quite" clearly meddled in the U.S. elections on behalf of the Trump campaign. The Washington Post points out that the FBI "wants facts and tangible evidence to prove something" while the CIA is "more comfortable drawing inferences." 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-12/fbi-disputes-cias-fuzzy-and-ambiguous-claims-russia-sought-influence-presidential-el

Rush Limbaugh explains it this way:

There are intel people all over the place, and one of them decided to call the Washington Post, which writes a totally anonymous and anemically sourced story that the New York Times immediately follows up. Then it becomes a huge story that attempts to delegitimize Trump's win and the election. And now you've got all of these Washington Post people downplaying the FBI's conclusion there's no evidence. James Comey already said there was no evidence that Russia hacked anything, including her server. Remember? He said there's no evidence the Russians even hacked Hillary's server. 

What we're talking about here is the Podesta emails being leaked to WikiLeaks. That's not tampering with the election. What did we learn in these hacks? We learned that it was the Hillary campaign buying and paying people to disrupt and cause violence at Donald Trump rallies. I mean, everything we learned happened to be true. How is this affecting the outcome of the election? 

Most people think, when they hear Russians hacked the election, they tampered with the ballots. You cast ballots and you count them, so what was the hack? Did the Russians hack the counting process? Did they hack the casting-of-ballots process? What did they do? Well, nothing, because nothing has been alleged along those lines. 

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/12/12/this_is_how_fake_news_becomes_the_narrative_russia_hacked_the_election

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17.12.2016 at 2:39 AM, Tbs77 said:

No the allegations is Russia hacking the DNC and John Podesta and possibly using Wikileaks to disclose campaign strategies... Which allegedly slowed down Democratic and independent voters enthusiam to get the to the polls to vote for Hillary Clinton and other Democrats down the ballot.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 

 

Yawn more fake news from the masters of fake news, the so-called "reliable media". Julian Assange said himself the source had nothing to do with Russia. So who to trust, an institution whose sole purpose is to reveal "truth" or a source from the CIA, an organization mainly engaged in disinformation and lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tbs77 said:

Obama plays it cool on the golf course as a wave of terror spread across Europe from Berlin to Turkey

https://www.google.com/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4049186/amp/The-Latest-Obama-starts-day-gym-Hawaii-vacation.html


3B878D7F00000578-0-image-a-51_1482200987495-743x446.jpg

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 

somehow I just can't picture Donny T teeing off  -  can U?

Edited by timpin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 22.1.2 (changelog)