Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

In Covid-19 regulations case, Sotomayor dissent claps back at Supreme Court majority


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 1448 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/covid-19-regulations-case-sotomayor-dissent-claps-back-supreme-court-n1249122

In a Supreme Court ruling just before midnight on Thanksgiving eve, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor penned another of her fiery dissents—this time warning, in her view, of the dangers of the Court’s majority position on New York State’s Covid-19 restrictions.

The high court, in a 5-4 vote, blocked restrictions on religious services that Governor Andrew Cuomo had introduced to fight the spread of the coronavirus. The majority found that Cuomo’s restrictions violated the First Amendment’s protection of free exercise of religion. These restrictions specified that, depending on infection rates, the number of worshippers at religious services could be limited. Justice Neil Gorsuch concurred, writing, in effect, that it was unconstitutional to have laws regulating churches and synagogues while allowing liquor stores and bike shops to reopen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep, all common sense is gown, their love of money and power is sickening. Cannot go to church, but you set one on fire. The re was a case were a judge was shocked when tehy reda the bible and read what it  says about homosexuality. So if I understand this correctly, they have swear oths on something they never raed? interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Golfguy74 said:

yep, all common sense is gown, their love of money and power is sickening. Cannot go to church, but you set one on fire. The re was a case were a judge was shocked when tehy reda the bible and read what it  says about homosexuality. So if I understand this correctly, they have swear oths on something they never raed? interesting

oops not gown but gone. not tehy but they, not reda but read


Edited by Golfguy74

poor spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean Sotomayor has a pretty long history of ruling in a way that's somewhat anti-first amendment. She also dissented, along with Ruth Bader Ginsberg on the ruling in favor of the Christian baker who refused to make a cake for a same sex wedding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)