Using Artificial Intelligence Wisely as Jehovah’s People

[Dré]

On 12/11/2025 at 8:08 AM, Lance said:

Personally I find a lot of comments that use AI totally …I just ignore.

 Many AI generated comments often sound polished but hollow …like they’re missing the warmth, nuance, or imperfections that make human communication feel alive. The language and tone is very neutral. Like talking to a beige wall…. Not that I talk to many beige walls but I think you get my drift.

 

On 12/11/2025 at 11:51 AM, carlos said:

I feel the same, Lance. I ignore comments that seem written by AI. I don't have the time to read what a machine has to say about anything.

 

I would be interested to know what guidelines or conclusions you rely on to determine that a brother’s or sister’s comment in a forum discussion on some topic was made with the help of AI. I’m not talking about tables or well-prepared essays or articles on a specific subject. I would be cautious about saying “this comment is possibly AI-generated.” I’m not suggesting that you need to read every comment, but putting a label on a comment as AI-made feels like confidence that isn’t supported by clear evidence.

 

Do you check every comment to decide whether it was generated by AI or not? Is my comment generated by AI?

 

Quote

In Russian: Мне было бы интересно узнать, по каким инструкциям или выводам, вы определяете, что комментарий брата или сестры, на форуме обсуждения какой-либо темы, был сделан с помощью ИИ? Я не говорю о таблицах, о хорошо подготовленных рефератах или статьях, на определённую тему. Я бы был осторожен говоря слово "возможно комментарий ИИ". Я не призываю читать все комментарии, но устанавливая ярлык, что комментарий сделан с помощью ИИ, это самоуверенность ничем не подтверждённая.

 

Вы каждый комментарий проверяете, он сгенерирован ИИ или нет? Мой комментарий сгенерирован ИИ?

 

Edited 13 hours ago by Dré

[LeolaRootStew]

9 hours ago, Dré said:

 

 

I would be interested to know what guidelines or conclusions you rely on to determine that a brother’s or sister’s comment in a forum discussion on some topic was made with the help of AI. I’m not talking about tables or well-prepared essays or articles on a specific subject. I would be cautious about saying “this comment is possibly AI-generated.” I’m not suggesting that you need to read every comment, but putting a label on a comment as AI-made feels like confidence that isn’t supported by clear evidence.

 

Do you check every comment to decide whether it was generated by AI or not? Is my comment generated by AI?

 

 

 

A lot of comments are easy to see are AI, especially if someone who speaks English as a second language suddenly writes perfect English for 8 paragraphs. I skip those ones because I don't find AI summaries of Bible topics to be valuable. I want to hear people's thoughts on the discussion.

[Dré]

3 hours ago, LeolaRootStew said:

A lot of comments are easy to see are AI, especially if someone who speaks English as a second language suddenly writes perfect English for 8 paragraphs. I skip those ones because I don't find AI summaries of Bible topics to be valuable. I want to hear people's thoughts on the discussion.

 

You must be a highly knowledgeable person, perfectly familiar with all international standards of English grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style, if you can so easily determine who wrote something, how it was written, and what tools were used.

 

From my perspective, this approach to reading comments reflects a lack of respect toward brothers and sisters, effectively passing judgment on them: “You are not worthy of attention or of being listened to.” In reality, there are people who use AI simply to express their thoughts more clearly and correctly. That does not mean they are not putting their heart into what they say or that they are not sincerely trying to participate in the discussion.

 

Ignoring such comments can be seen as overlooking the Golden Rule and not showing brotherly love. Still, each person acts according to how they were raised and in harmony with their own conscience.

[LeolaRootStew]

24 minutes ago, Dré said:

 

You must be a highly knowledgeable person, perfectly familiar with all international standards of English grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style, if you can so easily determine who wrote something, how it was written, and what tools were used.

 

I am. 

 

29 minutes ago, Dré said:

From my perspective, this approach to reading comments reflects a lack of respect toward brothers and sisters, effectively passing judgment on them: “You are not worthy of attention or of being listened to.” In reality, there are people who use AI simply to express their thoughts more clearly and correctly. That does not mean they are not putting their heart into what they say or that they are not sincerely trying to participate in the discussion.

 

 

From my perspective, posting AI summaries as if they are your own thoughts reflects a lack of respect toward brothers and sisters. Using AI to edit your own thoughts is completely different. We appear to be complaining about different things.

[Dré]

1 minute ago, LeolaRootStew said:

From my perspective, posting AI summaries as if they are your own thoughts reflects a lack of respect toward brothers and sisters. Using AI to edit your own thoughts is completely different. We appear to be complaining about different things.

 

Everything I’m writing in this discussion right now is my own personal thoughts, not AI. So, dear sister, you are mistaken if you think that I am writing using AI. If I do use AI, it is only as a translator.

[LeolaRootStew]

1 minute ago, Dré said:

 

Everything I’m writing in this discussion right now is my own personal thoughts, not AI. So, dear sister, you are mistaken if you think that I am writing using AI. If I do use AI, it is only as a translator.

 

I don't remember claiming you used AI.