So?
Many AI videos are widely shared on social media.
There are websites one can send the video to that would verify if it's AI. Of course AI uses these websites to improve their output.
In this day and age a video being widely shared on social media might very well prove it's fake.
Let's reason on this. You ever drive by a car crash, protest, building fire, or something out of the ordinary? What did you do? What did everyone around you do? Didn't they slow down to watch? Even if they drove by they still looked, didn't they?
In this video the woman pays literally no attention to the riot behind her. It doesn't attract her attention. The noise of the protest are not enough to disrupt her tea time. The fumes and smoke from the protest don't bother her. It's as if she's completely unaware what is going on behind her. Is she deaf, blind, and lacking in sense of smell in addition to curiosity and morality?
Who filmed the woman and why? The person filming the woman also was more focused on the woman than the much more interesting event going on in the background. And the camera is so still. Can you hold a camera that still for that long without the slightest shift or twitch? The scene seems staged, doesn't it? Planned. As if they knew the riot would unfold in the background.
RT is Russia Today, the state run propaganda agency of Russia. What is RT's record of fact based journalism?
The simplest answer is usually the correct answer. What makes the most sense - this woman lacks the curiosity that is common among all humans or the video is fake and created as a form of sarcastic commentary?