Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Hillary: 'Religious Beliefs' Must Change


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 2784 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

From more complete articles on the subject, what I gather is that she's saying that politicians should stop using religious beliefs to create and enforce quasi-theocratic laws, not that the religions themselves have to change.

 

In any case, this is just more political grandstanding with no meaningful message, just like every other election. In the lead-up to the election she's claiming to be "different" enough to gain the votes of whichever group is the largest, but if she actually wins she'll just be another face on the same old presidency, passing the same laws and pushing the same agenda.


Edited by Stavro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know Stavro, this is in quotes “And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed. As I have said and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century and not just for women but for everyone — and not just in far away countries but right here in the United States.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century

 

In countries that have such issues, including the US, this issue stems from religious-based laws, not enforced obedience to religions with zero political power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know Stavro, this is in quotes “And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed. As I have said and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century and not just for women but for everyone — and not just in far away countries but right here in the United States.”

Read this again, its garbly-gook. 

The advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies. Not just for women but for everyone.....I thought she was advocating for girls and women but suddenly it everyone....she's mentioning in other countries but also in the US. Boy I'm not any authority on the english sentence structure but this simply doesn't make sense. Garbly-gook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 22.12.4 (changelog)