Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Coming to a beach near us ...


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 2407 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

A country sized iceberg - the size of many small countries ... could conceivably start its journey towards NZ shores. (Not the first time, but certainly the biggest)

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/12/giant-antarctic-iceberg-breaks-free-of-larsen-c-ice-shelf

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubly so for me Jerry, we have gales and freezing wind/rain - snow not far away from us. Icebergs fit well into that list.

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would take decades for it to drift anywhere. A report I saw on the weather network said that it would flow around the continent of Antarctica for a very long time because of the currents around there not going anywhere but in a circle . 

Quando Omni Flunkus Moritadi

If all else fails --- Play Dead Possum Lodge Moto -- Red Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. A few questions if anyone knows or cares to speculate.

I guess that means it broke off from the mainland? 

If so, does that mean it will melt faster?

Will it make a noticeable difference in sea level?

Will it cause damage to animal or human life?

Part of global warming?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, M&M said:

Interesting. A few questions if anyone knows or cares to speculate.

I guess that means it broke off from the mainland? 

If so, does that mean it will melt faster?

Will it make a noticeable difference in sea level?

Will it cause damage to animal or human life?

Part of global warming?

It was a floating ice sheet attached indirectly to antarctic land mass. 

It will melt faster as it moves north.

As it is already floating it will not make any difference to sea levels.

Its effect on animal and human life will be minimal.

As an isolated incident it give no information at all about global warming. When added to the many incidents that have taken place in both the arctic, antactic and glacial melting it is a definate indicator.

It does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step :- Jer10:23.

Not a day goes by wherein the truth of this scripture is not reaffirmed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Greg Dent said:

It would take decades for it to drift anywhere. A report I saw on the weather network said that it would flow around the continent of Antarctica for a very long time because of the currents around there not going anywhere but in a circle . 

For goodness sake man, did you have to bring common sense into it! :angry::D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Greg Dent said:

It would take decades for it to drift anywhere. A report I saw on the weather network said that it would flow around the continent of Antarctica for a very long time because of the currents around there not going anywhere but in a circle . 

Hasn't been the case in recent years ... its quite common for an iceberg to float past NZ ... one was even in sight from the shore a few years ago.

 

Although, in the case of this one and the size of it, it won't be like the others.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/11/25/iceberg.newzealand/

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11739047


Edited by Stormswift

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stormswift said:

Hasn't been the case in recent years ... its quite common for an iceberg to float past NZ ... one was even in sight from the shore a few years ago.

 

Although, in the case of this one and the size of it, it won't be like the others.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/11/25/iceberg.newzealand/

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11739047

But when did those icebergs form initially?  Maybe they floated around Antarctica for years before finally drifting away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Shawnster said:

But when did those icebergs form initially?  Maybe they floated around Antarctica for years before finally drifting away. 

Agreed, and it may take a while for this one to break up ... as this is the biggest yet, but with the acceleration of global warming. it would not surprise me if at least some splinters from this will be seen.

 

The ones that passed in 2006 were from a calving in the year 2000. Eleven years on, with an acceleration of Global Warming it may take another four or less years to see the effects of this one. If we see it sooner, then things are worse than we think .. or is that possible?


Edited by Stormswift

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Stormswift said:

. If we see it sooner, then things are worse than we think .. or is that possible?

 

I don't know if one must lead to the other.  If global climate change worsens, who knows how that will affect such things?  It might do any number of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes ... if we have another earthquake like we've had we will move closer to Aussie, anything can happen, you can only guage things on the status quo until the statu quo changes.

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Australian government is arranging to fit some large outboard motors to the back of it to bring it back to Australia. Here it will be melted down for water and Airconditioning supplies.

It does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step :- Jer10:23.

Not a day goes by wherein the truth of this scripture is not reaffirmed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL ... as funny as that is ... there is a serious side to that, it is a lot of water that could be used for countries needing it, if the governments had got their skates on which we know they haven't.  Thanks for not taking my thread too serious about this big boy heading to our beaches. 

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is bigger, the iceberg or New Zealand?

It does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step :- Jer10:23.

Not a day goes by wherein the truth of this scripture is not reaffirmed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)