Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Shawnster

Community Assistant
  • Posts

    35,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    313

Shawnster's Achievements

  1. I hear you. I agree with you. I can also tell you how they are thinking and what is causing this confusion. Look at the principles outlined in that update: 3.1. [Principle 1of3] Would Jehovah Be Offended by This? At 2 Corinthians 6:17, Jehovah gives us clear direction: “‘Therefore, get out from among them, and separate yourselves,’ says Jehovah, ‘and quit touching the unclean thing’; ‘and I will take you in.’” This principle emphasizes that Christians must stay far away from any symbol or custom related to false religion or spiritism. 3.2. [Principle 2of3] How Would This Affect Others in the Congregation? Romans 14:19 and 21 remind us: “So, then, let us pursue the things making for peace and the things that build one another up.” “It is best not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything over which your brother stumbles.” Even if a symbol or custom isn’t wrong in itself, we need to consider how others in the congregation might view it. We would never want our actions to offend others needlessly. At the same time, as mature Christians we respect the right that others have to make their own decisions based on their Bible-trained conscience. 3.3. [Principle 3of3] How Is This Symbol or Custom Viewed by People in My Culture or Community? The principle here is that we take into account how others feel about and view matters. Knowing how a certain symbol or custom is viewed in our own country or community is very important. Something that is very offensive in our land or culture may be viewed as completely innocent in another land or culture. So the Christian needs to be primarily concerned about what? “Not what a certain symbol or design possibly meant thousands of years ago or how it might be thought of on the other side of the world, but what it means now to most people where he lives.” It's that last paragraph above that people talking about Thanksgiving or birthdays are focused on. Birthdays, like toasting, are not viewed in our community as having any connection with false religion or spiritism. It's not connected to nationalism. Points 1 and 3 both focus on whether the custom, practice, symbol, or object is currently associated with false religion or spiritism in the community we reside in. Celebrating birthdays or Thanksgiving or any of these other holidays are, in my opinion, non-starters. We're not going back to these or any other holiday. At the very least celebrating these holidays would violate principle 2 listed above - How would this affect the congregation? Suddenly celebrating these holidays would stumble many in the congregation. I never thought brothers would have beards or sisters wear slacks to the meeting. I'm sure many here thought that was obvious. In fact, when the change in meeting attire was first announced a very faithful brother made it clear to me how this troubled him. He even shared how we were always recognized by "how well we dressed." I know I always mocked Christendom when I'd see them not wearing a tie and sport jacket. Yet, here we are. Same thing regarding toasting. I thought it was obvious why we did not engage in such a practice. I thought it was quite clear that toasting was a way of offering a drink offering, which is a form of worship, to whomever or whatever was being toasted. What you and I think is obvious is not so obvious to someone else. Birthdays do not hold any religious significance in my community (I can't speak for anyone else). Thanksgiving does not seem all that nationalistic. I guarantee you nobody in the United States celebrating Thanksgiving could explain to you the nationalistic origin. They all think it came from the Pilgrims at Plymouth Rock. So, to connect back to the principles listed above - Birthdays and Thanksgiving are no longer viewed as religious or nationalistic in my community. I'm not saying this is the correct reasoning a Christian should be using. I am saying this is the line of reasoning they are following though. Again, this is why I imagine we will have a Watchtower with clarification before too long. This reasoning should apply equally to sisters as well as brothers, no? I think it's safe to say that, when I was your age (or a tad younger), I believed the same thing about men with only 1 earring. The expression was "left is right and right is wrong" which meant a man with an earring in the left ear was straight but the right ear was gay. Rubbish. There is and was no such code.
  2. While these speculations are running wild, it is understandable. As an organization we have always held fast to the truth. We have been told repeatedly how we follow the scriptures and long ago purged all traces of false religion. All of these worldly customs and practices and traditions have pagan origins, and are rooted in false religion and so we avoid them at all costs. So you can understand how hard it is to accept some of these changes. And we are having a lot of changes in a short time. Unlike most of the beliefs that have been clarified over the decades, these recent changes affect our daily lives. The line of reasoning presented in the update is that if a custom or practice has no religious significance in our community, then the custom or practice is a conscience matter and up to each individual to decide. This line of reasoning now opens up a lot of possibilities that up to last week were never even considered. Offering a toast does not have any religious significance in my community and people do not think they are invoking God's blessings. OK, what else is there? God bless you. Gesundheit. na zdrowie. Offering an expressing to someone who sneezes is no longer viewed as having religious or superstitious significance but is considered good manners. Yes, we have Watchtowers that clearly state why this would be a wrong practice for Christians, the reasoning is exactly the same as why we avoided offering toasts. Clearly line of reasoning from this update also applies to this custom when someone sneezes. OK, what next? Thanksgiving? Our community attaches no religious significance to this. Christmas? That continues to lose religious significance. OK, like you I agree these questions cross the line and in no way will we ever celebrate these holidays, but you see why people here are going down this road. OK, so the holidays are really off track, but what about tattoos? We are no longer under the Mosaic Law and, more importantly, people who get tattoos are not doing so for a dead person (with the exception of the memorial tattoos). These tattoos are no longer viewed as having any religious significance., just like offering toasts of a blessing when someone sneezes. What else? Knock on wood? Nose rings? Men with earrings? Gaged ears? We are allowed beards now. The same reasoning why some would say men with pierced ears is wrong is the same reasoning that used to be used to explain why beards were wrong. I'm confident we will receive further guidance on the full extent this new approach extends.
  3. Likewise with drink offerings, which is what a toast is. 'let's raise a glass to... " " let's drink to... "
  4. We said the same thing about toasting just last month.
  5. What is stopping you from doing so? We are encouraged to invite ones over. We are encouraged to have others join us in personal study/family worship. Why not invite a couple of couples or families over and do this for personal study/family worship?
  6. We don't. That's the whole point of the broadcast. By stating our conscience is involved the Organization is saying "do not look to us for a list about every custom that is acceptable and unacceptable. Use your conscience. What might be fine for you might be wrong for me."
  7. Well, some articles I saw said the bombings only set Iran back about a month in their efforts. If true, then the US is only making half-hearted attempts. Politics? International Relations? Does a half-hearted attack placate Russia into not stepping in?
  8. The national level of Fox News presents the news with a very heavy slant in favor of the current political party in office. Now, all news outlets can or do spin the stories they present. Some just spin or lean in a particular direction more than others. This is less of an issue at the local news level, but it still happens.
  9. Have you tried searching on Truepeoplesearch.com or any other site like that? We've gotten quite adept at finding addresses since covid.
  10. Some of my searches From wol.jw.org what scriptures show the burden of responsibility elders have and how they are answerable to Jehovah Using wol.jw.org what scripture basically says people who knowingly and willingly sin after having knowledge there's no forgiveness for them Using only wol.jw.org and jw.org what is the difference between intercessor and mediator Using wol.jw.org what role will the anointed have at Armageddon Now, a problem I have ran into is that chatgtp will sometimes reference a Watchtower for a specific date, article, page and paragraph, yet that article does not exist. Maybe the magazine is the wrong date. There have definitely been specific quotes that I cannot find in any magazine. Always verify the references
  11. You're still calculating, though. Once the math comes out, we've begun a fools errand. Since there is nothing in the scriptures that discusses the length of time previous nations existed, this is a non factor. That being said, we understand based on Bible prophecy that there is not much time left. Jesus said the last days would be seen by 1 generation, which indicates a limited time. Those keeping on the watch see clearly all the indicators that we are in the final part of the last days. But we still cannot calculate anything. Not the day, month, nor year.
  12. Yes. The UN gains power and pretty much immediately we go into the great tribulation. There will not be an opportunity to return that power to the nations. Plus, once someone or something gains power, they typically don't want to give it back
  13. And there you go... Iran fires missiles toward US military bases in Qatar and Iraq https://www.cnn.com/webview/world/live-news/israel-iran-us-strikes-06-23-25-intl-hnk?adobe_mc=TS%3D1750699521|MCMID%3D08663742468277334497187081918837612039|MCORGID%3D7FF852E2556756057F000101%40AdobeOrg&iid=cnn-mobile-app

Shawnster last won the day on July 6

Shawnster had the most liked content!

About Shawnster

  • Birthday 11/24/1971

Member's Public Information

  • Gender
    Brother
  • First Name
    Shawn
  • Relationship Status
    Married
  • Displayed Location
    Northeast Ohio
  • Publisher
    Yes
  • Baptized
    Yes
  • Website URL

How I Found the Truth

  • How I found the Truth
    My mother was contacted by the Witnesses when I was 3 years old.

My Hobbies & Interests

  • My Interests
    Science fiction, especially Star Trek and Star Wars; motorsports, specifically IndyCars; visiting wineries; playing cards

Recent Profile Visitors

32,633 profile views

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)