Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Threads revisited...another meaningless topic


Recommended Posts

I don't know who changed the topic bar because it does not say who edited it.  But this was not my original title.  I could repost it but ---why bother? :unsure:

I was making a joke about how some people can not bear to resurrect "old" threads--but to many new ones they are not old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-but to many new ones they are not old.

 

 I agree. Being fairly new here I often see a topic that is added to but is an older thread and have found myself reading though it. Sometimes it saves me from repeating something. Repeating, though, may not always be bad because there are other new ones here also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even Jehovah gives us constant reminders!  Many things require repeating.  I don't know how many times we study the same thing over and over--to impress/stress upon us certain points.  Just like a group of people talking and someone else joins the discussion they may need to be brought up to speed so things will be repeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm but the bible talks about the  resurrect "old" threads oh what umm let see no! 

hay some old thread need to be like

star wars

star trek

SCI-FI

eating

cooking 

sleeping 

meeting 

what tie to were on sunday

so what roung with  resurrect those "old" threads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm but the bible talks about the  resurrect "old" threads oh what umm let see no! 

hay some old thread need to be like

star wars

star trek

SCI-FI

eating

cooking 

sleeping 

meeting 

what tie to were on sunday

so what roung with  resurrect those "old" threads

And beards. :beard2:   Some of these categories lead themselves to humorous responses.  The humor is sometimes missed, as the written word does not always convey our intent.   How about, we give each brother and sister some leeway, please.   If the thread was all out serious, and I missed the focus, let me apologize ahead of time. :blushing:  If it was meant to be light- hearted, and I went all serious on you, again let me front load it with apologies.   :surrender: Two dimensional communication has its unique challenges, especially since we frequently have difficulty when all our senses are engaged.  


Edited by kejedo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I agree. Being fairly new here I often see a topic that is added to but is an older thread and have found myself reading though it. Sometimes it saves me from repeating something. Repeating, though, may not always be bad because there are other new ones here also.

Yup, some of us came late to the party.  :party:


Edited by kejedo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know who changed the topic bar because it does not say who edited it.  But this was not my original title.  I could repost it but ---why bother? :unsure:

I was making a joke about how some people can not bear to resurrect "old" threads--but to many new ones they are not old.

 

Hmm, I wonder who changed the title   :unsure:  :lol1: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't...

There was a lot of things that Adam and Eve didn't do.

They didn't go to bars or dances to find someone for a mate. They didn't have to conceal themselves when they wanted a private moment. At least, not in the beginning. They didn't have to save up for a house and get a mortgage. They didn't have to go to the market to buy their food.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you ever wondered if Adam and Eve spoke in Palindromes?

"MADAM IM ADAM"

"NAME NO ONE MAN"

p.s. 666 is a palindromic number. 

Of course not, but this was started (I believe) in a humorous vein, not the jugular. "Ha, I kill me" (80s saying)  :yawning:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I see the humour in that...

Don't you see the humour in mine?

"Ha, I kill me!"

'80s? For teenagers, I guess. Probably developed slowly in the late '60s or early '70s. I'm only guessing, of course, I've probably only ever heard it a couple of times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 22.12.4 (changelog)