Peace and Security, Great Tribulation, Armageddon

[Dages]

41 minutes ago, Michał said:

I feel like the AI hallucinated too much

Yeah, AI is still far from perfect

[Ric]

15 hours ago, Michał said:

Tenho a impressão de que a IA teve muitas alucinações aqui 😉

There are many reasons to expect that the end of this system is very near. An additional point is the fact that the year 2033 will mark 2,000 years since Jesus died for humanity—a historic milestone. When considered alongside various other factors, this raises the question of whether Jesus Christ will remain inactive as Judge at the start of yet another millennium. In a sense, it would be like a "third day," given that to Jehovah, a day is like a thousand years. In the case of his physical death, Jesus rose on the third day; regarding his return to judge the earth, however, we do not know if that will occur at the beginning of the third "day" or sometime during it—that is, a few years later. The truth is that the year 2033 remains an unknown—a period that may yet need to pass before the prophecies are fulfilled.

[Doug]

Featured on our Home Page is the article What Does the Bible Say About Nuclear War?

A few snippets from the article say ~ There is the fear that the use of just one small-scale nuclear weapon will ignite a full-scale nuclear war that will devastate our world.  Will God permit nuclear war?  The Bible does not say. It does say that "fearful sights", or terrifying events , would occur in our day.  Even if man were to use nuclear weapons again, God would not allow the situation to escalate to the point of global annihilation.

 

In the news today is an article about the Pentagon drafting a new nuclear strategy designed to give the USA more options for using shorter-range nuclear weapons. The theory is to have credible limited-response options short of an all-out strategic exchange.

 

Our website provides us, and the public, with the comfort of knowing this planet will not be destroyed, even if there is some use of nuclear weapons again!

[Shawnster]

4 hours ago, Doug said:

the news today is an article about the Pentagon drafting a new nuclear strategy designed to give the USA more options for using shorter-range nuclear weapons. The theory is to have credible limited-response options short of an all-out strategic exchange.

 

They had such programs in the 60s 

 

The M28 or M29 Davy Crockett Weapon System was a tactical nuclear recoilless smoothbore gun for firing the M388 nuclear projectile, armed with the W54 nuclear warhead, that was deployed by the United States during the Cold War. It was the first project assigned to the United States Army Weapon Command in Rock Island, Illinois.[3] It remains one of the smallest nuclear weapon systems ever built, incorporating a warhead with yields of 10 to 20 tons of TNT (42 to 84 GJ). It is named after American folk hero, soldier, and congressman Davy Crockett. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_

 

They also had a similar program in the 80s 

 

The Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM), also known as the XM129 and XM159 Atomic Demolition Charges,[1] and the B54 bomb[2] was a nuclear man-portable atomic demolition munition (ADM) system fielded by the US military from the 1960s to 1980s but never used in combat. It had an estimated yield of up to 1 kiloton of TNT.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition