Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

It's Official


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 4167 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

The Supremes have just ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional.  That's okay.  The more this world morally decays, the closer I feel to the end!

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-26/defense-of-marriage-act-provision-struck-down-by-top-u-s-court.html

Live long and prosper. 🖖🏻

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next - laws against 2 people having sex BEFORE the age of 16 will be consider an infringement on ones' rights. The question will be - why do the states have the right to regulate sex between 2 consenting individuals? Then even pedophilia will be legal.

 

They have already started this with questioning laws about two 16 year old "lovers" - and then one turns 18 and ends up arrested as a "sexual predator".

http://www.contracostatimes.com/contra-costa-times/ci_22885793/judge-dismisses-statutory-rape-case-involving-consensual-sex

 

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/18-year-old-woman-accused-of-statutory-rape-becomes-homosexual-icon/

 

"Hang on we are in for a bumpy ride."

 

EDIT> - Italy - http://news.sky.com/story/1107593/bunga-bunga-trial-silvio-berlusconi-guilty


Edited by trottigy
Plan ahead as if Armageddon will not come in your lifetime, but lead your life as if it will come tomorrow (w 2004 Dec. 1 page 29)

 

 

 

 

Soon .....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Supremes have just ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional.  That's okay.  The more this world morally decays, the closer I feel to the end!

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-26/defense-of-marriage-act-provision-struck-down-by-top-u-s-court.html

HOORAY!!!!* 

 

Next - laws against 2 people having sex BEFORE the age of 16 will be consider an infringement on ones' rights. The question will be - why do the states have the right to regulate sex between 2 consenting individuals? Then even pedophilia will be legal.

 

They have already started this with questioning laws about two 16 year old "lovers" - and then one turns 18 and ends up arrested as a "sexual predator".

http://www.contracostatimes.com/contra-costa-times/ci_22885793/judge-dismisses-statutory-rape-case-involving-consensual-sex

 

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/18-year-old-woman-accused-of-statutory-rape-becomes-homosexual-icon/

 

"Hang on we are in for a bumpy ride."

HOORAY!!!!*

 

Jerry, I've stared speculating on that one myself.  The laws really are illogical and nonsense.  She's 15, he's 18.  The 3 year difference is OK by law.  If he's 19, though, BAM!  He's a sexual predator and labeled for life.  Like that 1 year really makes a difference? 

 

I reasoned with my stepson that Bible principles are so much easier.  What is the age of sexual consent in the Bible?  There isn't one.  The Bible has 1 simple guideline (well, 2):  No sexual contact unless it's with a marriage mate, and it's best to not marry until past the bloom of youth.  That's it.  Do you feel you're old enough to be married?  No?  Are you married?  No?  Then no sex for you.  Plain and simple.

 

Man makes his laws much more complex.


Edited by Shawnster

* Asterik denotes sarcasm. Well, maybe not sarcasm as I agree with Julsey's thought about the decay.

Phillipians 4:8 Finally, brothers, whatever things are true, whatever things are of serious concern, whatever things are righteous, whatever things are chaste, whatever things are lovable, whatever things are well-spoken-of, whatever things are virtuous, and whatever things are praiseworthy, continue considering these things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)