All Activity

Yaaaay!!! Thank you Jehovah🤗

fraternities have lured many into association with the world

DNA is a very complex thing. Can we actually say that we have Neanderthal DNA? Some of the DNA controls how many legs we have. That part of the DNA would be the similar for all bipedal animals. Everyone gets 50% of their DNA randomly from each parent. You might not have any DNA in common with an ancestor that lived a thousand years ago. A DNA test might not be able to tell someone was your ancestor that long ago. Of course, there is more to DNA than just the tests that find relatives. It is a very complex subject.

Jehovah wins again

The decisions to deny Jehovah’s Witnesses state funding and registration are invalid. Vedtak om nekte Jehovas vitner statstilskudd og registrering er ugyldige Decision declaring invalid the denial of state subsidies and registration for Jehovah’s Witnesses Supreme Court judgment, 29 April 2026, HR‑2026‑1009‑A (Case no. 25‑089326SIV‑HRET), civil case, appeal from Borgarting Court of Appeal. The case concerns the validity of five administrative decisions denying state subsidies and one decision deregistering Jehovah’s Witnesses as a religious community, as well as the refusal to grant new registration. The State argued that the community’s practice of social shunning violates children’s rights and members’ right to freely withdraw, cf. the Religious Communities Act §6 and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) Article 9. The Supreme Court reviewed the organization and teachings of Jehovah’s Witnesses, including the practice of disfellowshipping and social shunning, and the legal framework under the Religious Communities Act and freedom of religion under the ECHR. The Court emphasized that the threshold for denying subsidies and registration is high, and that §6 must be interpreted in light of religious autonomy under ECHR Articles 9 and 11. Children’s rights The Court unanimously found that the State had not provided sufficient evidence that Jehovah’s Witnesses subject minors to psychological violence or negative social control of such severity that children’s legally protected rights are violated. It emphasized internal guidelines for handling minors, that family bonds are not broken, and that there was no documented actual extent of disfellowshipping of children. Right to free withdrawal The Court assessed whether social shunning of former members violates the right to free withdrawal. The Court found that Jehovah’s Witnesses meet the requirement of free and unconditional withdrawal under §2 of the Act. A majority of three judges held that the practice does not constitute undue pressure in violation of ECHR Article 9. They emphasized that the practice is rooted in doctrine, known to members upon joining, and does not involve direct pressure, coercion, or threats. Gjeldende side The practice does not apply to family members in the same household, and family bonds are not broken for relatives outside the household. The majority concluded that the conditions for denying subsidies and registration were not met. Dissent Two judges dissented regarding whether the practice exerts undue pressure on members wishing to leave. They emphasized potential loss of contact with family members, especially minors, and that the practice is a rule‑based sanction intended to be a felt consequence. Gjeldende side The minority therefore believed the conditions for denying subsidies and registration were met. They also found that the refusal to register constituted an interference with religious freedom under ECHR Article 9(1), but that the interference was justified. Gjeldende side Clarification The judgment clarifies the threshold for denying subsidies and registration of religious communities, and how the rules must be assessed in light of religious freedom under the ECHR.

Territory management is not just about storing addresses, but about supporting real congregation workflows. In the past, the territory servant could immediately see when a territory was completed. Now, according to the screenshots and comments, that information seems to be buried inside individual territory history, forcing brothers to manually scroll through territories and search for dates. That may sound like a small usability issue, but operationally it becomes a major problem. In many congregations, a completed territory triggers additional ministry work, like extracting Not Homes or identifying vacant or difficult addresses for future follow-up So the “territory completed” action is not simply informational. It is actually a workflow event that other ministry activities depend on. When users can no longer easily query or filter that information, the software shifts work back onto the territory servant manually. Instead of helping organize the ministry, the brothers are forced to search through raw territory history themselves. From a design perspective, this usually happens when systems focus mainly on displaying current territory state rather than exposing meaningful operational events in a searchable way. Good territory systems should allow brothers to instantly answer questions such as: Which territories were completed this week? Which territories contain Not Homes? Which addresses need telephone follow-up? Which territories have not been worked recently? Which territories were completed on weekends versus midweek? That requires more than simple lists or static records. It requires queryable historical events and workflow-aware design. The goal of Baruch is that territory servants should never need to “hunt for information.” The software should help surface the information needed for the next ministry step quickly and clearly. To me, that is where congregation software creates real value: not by storing more data, but by reducing administrative friction and helping brothers focus on the ministry itself.

A territory completion is not a minor action. In many congregations it is the trigger for several follow-up processes. Because of that, duplicate completion records can quickly create confusion and reduce trust in the accuracy of the data. What likely happened here is that the completion action was processed more than once during synchronization. This can occur when: a mobile device retries a request after a slow connection synchronization temporarily fails and resends the same action different clients process the same update independently the server cannot distinguish between a new event and a repeated one In NWS, synchronization is state-based: “Here is the latest territory state.” But actions like “territory completed” are actually events, and events should only be processed once. That way, if synchronization retries occur, the system can recognize: “This event was already processed.” Personally, I think this highlights an important shift that congregation software must make. Once mobile apps and synchronization are involved, the architecture must be designed around reliability and event integrity first — not just convenience features. In Baruch, territory actions are being designed as immutable events with unique identifiers and synchronization tracking. This allows duplicate sync attempts to be safely ignored while preserving a complete historical audit trail. For congregation administration, reliability is far more important than adding more features. If brothers cannot fully trust the data, the software eventually creates more work instead of reducing it.

In the screenshots, some addresses only show entries such as “Sat AM” or “Wed AM,” while other addresses display full dates. Previously, the territory history appeared to be much more consistent. That inconsistency may seem cosmetic at first, but in reality it directly affects how efficiently territories can be worked. Many congregations intentionally work territories at different times. Because of that, accurate historical date information becomes very valuable. It helps publishers avoid repeatedly calling at the same ineffective time and makes territory work more strategic and organized. When date information becomes inconsistent or partially disappears, the territory data loses analytical value. It stops being reliable ministry history and becomes little more than fragmented notes. From a technical perspective, this often happens when different app versions or synchronization models store date information differently. One client may save a structured timestamp, while another only saves a simplified “time slot” value such as “Sat AM.” During synchronization or migration, parts of the metadata may then be overwritten or lost. This is another reason why I believe territory systems should preserve immutable historical events instead of only storing the latest visible state. Every territory action should contain the exact timestamp, the publisher involved, type of activity. In Baruch, territory history is designed to remain historically consistent over time, even when synchronization occurs between devices or app versions. The goal is not simply to display territory data, but to preserve meaningful ministry history that congregations can continue to rely on years later.

One thing that immediately stands out to me is the loss of the publisher name connected to territory activity. At first glance this may seem like a small issue, but in practice it is actually a serious data integrity problem. Territory information is not only used to track whether an address was worked. It is also historical ministry data that helps the territory servant and elders understand what happened at an address and why certain statuses were assigned. Once the publisher name disappears, all context is lost. The status remains, but the history behind it is gone. From a technical perspective, this usually happens when systems overwrite the current territory state during synchronization instead of preserving the original event that created the change. In other words, the system remembers the latest status, but no longer remembers who created it. Personally, I believe territory systems should preserve a complete historical trail for every address update. Without that history, territory data gradually becomes less reliable over time. This is one of the reasons why Baruch is being designed around immutable history/events rather than simply overwriting the latest state. Every territory action remains traceable, while still respecting privacy principles by avoiding unnecessary centralized personal data storage. Good territory management is not only about synchronization. It is about preserving trust in the accuracy and accountability of the data.

It might be a soothing balm from the point of view of the countrymen of each land. The Brits will want to say that HM did a good job and those across the pond will be hoping to 'drive down' the current negative rhetoric.

Why do people not show mercy to others, not hear their cries of suffering, cries for help and for mercy? Yet when they themselves fall into trouble and endure suffering, they begin to cry out for mercy. 2 Chronicles 33:6, 10, 11, 12. The story of Manasseh in the Bible illustrates exactly this paradox: while he had power and prosperity, he ignored warnings and the suffering of others, but when he found himself in humiliation and pain, he suddenly became able to hear, to understand, and to humble himself. This question concerns not only people of wealth; any person can act in this way.

You have a loving way with words, brother Hubert.

From what I understand we could say some people were Nearandenthals just like today some are Pygmy or Masai.

Situationship is a word used to describe a romantic or sexual relationship lacking commitment, or clear boundaries. It confirms the confused moral views of many today, and highlights a problem of worldly fraternities.

Good point. The only reason they are called Neaderthal is the district that had the caves with their remains. There were lots of other caves but the name does not change, except in the case of the giant tooth of Denisova Cave in Russia.

Teacher and students relationships are often a love hate situationship

esd_april_30.mp3

Don’t stay in sin. Change your course. Repent.

Wow. You have skills very beautiful 😍 I can only imagine what type of jewelery I'll make when I live forever.

Here is a tutorial I found on YouTube. I get my tools from Michael's craft store. You can do a search I haven't made any jewelery in a while. One of the charms has a cross this is not my video (disclaimer)

Since the Bible is silent on most of this, who can say? One of the points I was trying to make was we don't know how manr Nephilim there were. The fewer the number, the less likely it is any of their fossils survived for us to find. The scriptures do not mention anything about their DNA. There is no evidence to support that Nephilim DNA was any different than human. There is no evidence to support the supposition that the Nephilim were genetically different in any way. In fact, the Bible does not even say they were hybrids. That's an assumption. It might be a logical assumption, but we lack sufficient evidence to support a conclusion. We don't know how the demons pulled off being able to mate with human women and produce offspring. If those offspring, the Nephilim, were also fertile and capable of reproduction, then they would be genetically indistinguishable from natural humans. In regards the supposed Nephilim being a separate species, this is evolutionary propaganda. It's a twisting of the facts to support their god-dishonoring theory. Humans are one species - human. Or, if you want to use the biblical description, we are the same kind. The genetic differences between groups of humans do not create separate species. They are variations within the species. Just like dogs. Terriers and dobermans are both the same species - dogs. The genetic differences may result in variety of appearance and could pose danger in reproduction, but they are all still dogs. These ideas that Neanderthals were a separate species that lost the evolutionary lottery and died out is fantasy. These scientists have latched onto a set of unique genetic characteristics and decided this is evidence of a separate species. This is the same thinking that fuels racism and the separation of humans into distinct groups based on a unique combination of genetics and ancestral place of birth.

So, same DNA from mom / Eve's side ... Could still be Nephilim. That could be compatible with Genesis as a separate line.

Are you depressed? They have the answer? Its because of Neanderthal DNA!!!! https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/neanderthal-dna-linked-depression-nicotine-addiction-psychiatric-diseases-embargo-7pm-1543303 And on it goes with their theories. Maybe we have Piltdown DNA too.

Are they guessing what part of DNA is Neanderthal? Oddly they say Africans don't have Neanderthal DNA. They want you to believe that for what reason?