Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

So the Word "Prejudism" is not an Official Word?


Recommended Posts

The words prejudice, prejudiced and prejudicial can all be found in dictionaries, but not the word "prejudism", except in an Urban Dictionary.

Yet we often hear this word "prejudism" in public, on TV, on the news, etc. However, when checking the WT Library, guess what? The FDS does not use this word! How interesting but strange that a common word like "prejudism" does not seem to be an official word. :shrugs:

 

Maybe there is some prejudice against the word prejudism? :D


Edited by Beggar for the Spirit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a suffix appearing in loanwords from Greek, whereit was used to form action nouns from verbs (baptism); on this model, used as a productive suffixin the formation of nouns denoting action orpractice, state or condition, principles, doctrines, ausage or characteristic, devotion or adherence, etc.( criticism; barbarism; Darwinism; despotism;plagiarism; realism; witticism; intellectualism). Brother carlos :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Alexa said:

a suffix appearing in loanwords from Greek, whereit was used to form action nouns from verbs (baptism); on this model, used as a productive suffixin the formation of nouns denoting action orpractice, state or condition, principles, doctrines, ausage or characteristic, devotion or adherence, etc.( criticism; barbarism; Darwinism; despotism;plagiarism; realism; witticism; intellectualism). Brother carlos :)

So Carlo-ism would denote opinions stated by Carlos? :dance:LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Gregexplore said:

This is when you get fine by policeman for speeding and you blame your car for it :whistling:

But it's true! It was the car! :lol:

 

I understand what prejudism might mean, but I am not sure that meaning is not covered already by "prejudice". Ex: He behaved that way due to prejudice.

 

I'm trying to understand in which context "prejudism" might do a better job that plain vanilla "prejudice".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since prejudice is already a noun, adding “ism” to make it a noun seems redundant. It may be the person is trying to show the word to be “a practice, doctrine or ideology” instead of just a noun.  It is used sometimes but it does not show in regular dictionaries.

 

-ism

Word Origin: (dictionary.com)

 

a suffix appearing in loanwords from Greek, where it was used to form action nouns from verbs ( baptism); on this model, used as a productive suffix in the formation of nouns denoting action or practice, state or condition, principles, doctrines, a usage or characteristic,devotion  or adherence, etc. ( criticism; barbarism; Darwinism;despotism; plagiarism; realism; witticism; intellectualism).

 

Greek -ismos, -isma noun suffixes, often directly, often through Latin -ismus, -isma, sometimes through French -isme, German -ismus (allultimately < Gk)

 

Prejudice: (dictionary.com)

Noun

 

1.an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or withoutknowledge, thought, or reason.

2. any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable.

 

Verb (used with object)prejudiced, prejudicing.

 

to affect with a prejudice, either favorable or unfavorable:

His honesty and sincerity prejudiced us in his favor.

 

Related forms:

prejudicedly,  adverb

prejudiceless, adjective

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation with your brothers and sisters!


You can post now, and then we will take you to the membership application. If you are already a member, sign in now to post with your existing account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 22.12.4 (changelog)