Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Peace and Security, Great Tribulation, Armageddon


Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Julsey said:

Um, no. Sorry. The fact that they agree with one another proves nothing to me. They have lied, obfuscated, and misled plenty of times. It’s been over 30 years since I trusted the MSM. That is my opinion, and everyone else is entitled to theirs, but in the end, that is all it is: an opinion. Not saying that they are incorrect on the current subject under discussion, but I just don’t have the blind faith in them that so many seem to have. 

It’s interesting that 90% of all U.S. news media, and virtually all the major sources, both left and right, are all owned by the same 6 companies. While there's some news media outlets that I don't care for, I try to remember that even the ones I do watch put their spin on things. In my opinion, both left and right news media are used in this country to indoctrinate, brainwash, mislead, distract, advertise, influence and have people in a constant state of fear and panic because fearful people are easier to control and contain since they are always looking for someone to guide and tell them what to do. While I don't think all news reported by mainstream media has an ulterior motive, it's good to take the things you hear and see in the media with a grain of salt.

The Hebrew word cushi or kushi is an affectionate term generally used in the Bible to refer to a dark-skinned person of African descent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Julsey said:

They have lied, obfuscated, and misled plenty of times. It’s been over 30 years since I trusted the MSM

And in that time you have found a completely honest and reputable secular source? 

 

Without you being there to eyewitness the events (whatever events we are considering), what is your litmus test to determine or verify the sources you trust are trustworthy? 

 

What sources do you consider reliable, trustworthy, and truthful?

 

This sounds aggressive and perhaps offensive. I apologize. 


Edited by Shawnster

Phillipians 4:8 Finally, brothers, whatever things are true, whatever things are of serious concern, whatever things are righteous, whatever things are chaste, whatever things are lovable, whatever things are well-spoken-of, whatever things are virtuous, and whatever things are praiseworthy, continue considering these things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

News media prior to and present is biased. I see it with Fox News, CNN, ABC World News, News Nation (new one for me), and the paper articles, like Daily Mail, Independent, Washington Post, The Associated Press (AP), Bloomberg News, Reuters, Agency France-Presse (AFP), The BBC, Xinhua News Agency and on and on and on!  I see them as Satan's organizations.  You can't take them at their word.  Words of honor flew out yrs ago.  

Plus lots are very political.  To over whelming.  I catch a local channel and weather.  Jw.org for What's New.  The brothets pretty up to date with real News that matters.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Allabord4Jah said:

News media prior to and present is biased. I see it with Fox News, CNN, ABC World News, News Nation (new one for me), and the paper articles, like Daily Mail, Independent, Washington Post, The Associated Press (AP), Bloomberg News, Reuters, Agency France-Presse (AFP), The BBC, Xinhua News Agency and on and on and on!  I see them as Satan's organizations


 

 Don’t forget the Oscars my sis.

 

 https://abcnews.com/GMA/Culture/oscars-2026-full-winners-list/story?id=130769299


Edited by Dustparticle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Julsey said:

Um, no. Sorry. The fact that they agree with one another proves nothing to me. They have lied, obfuscated, and misled plenty of times. It’s been over 30 years since I trusted the MSM. That is my opinion, and everyone else is entitled to theirs

 

Jean Cocteau (1889-1963) said ~ "One must not mistake majority for truth."

 

I remind myself that doctors and newspapers are For-Profit  entities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation with your brothers and sisters!


You can post now, and then we will take you to the membership application. If you are already a member, sign in now to post with your existing account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)