Most people, even those who live in the US, call it a "democracy", which is technically wrong, since it is actually a "republic".
Democracy
Direct Rule: Citizens vote directly on laws and policies instead of using leaders.
Majority Control: The side with the most votes wins and makes the rules.
High Participation: Everyone takes part in daily choices for the group.
Republic
Elected Leaders: People choose representatives to make laws and run the government for them.
Rule of Law: A written constitution is the highest law.
Rights for All: Laws protect minority groups so the majority cannot take away basic rights.
If we call the US a democracy - are we compromising our neutrality?
If we call it a republic - are we compromising our neutrality?
Since, in the broadest context, both describe the US in terms most people accept as what the US is, using either of those terms does not put us on one side or the other of the pollical or social arena. Likewise, referring to any government with the commonly viewed method they rule or the way their rule is perceived by most of the population is also not compromising our neutrality.
That said ...
The bigger question is, since the OP asked:
What do any of the recent posts have to do with the original question asked in this thread?
A simple, "yes" or "no" as respects have you read the poem or seen the movie would answer the question. Discussing the meaning of "Woke" or various forms of government of various nations on this planet has no bearing on the question that was asked.
To that end, "No", I have not read the poem nor have I seen the movie.