Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

The Mysterious Coronavirus Spreading Worldwide


Recommended Posts

Several websites seem to indicate that above 90%, isopropyl alcohol loses it's viability as a disinfectant.
I would use 70% for disinfecting, 90%+ for cleaning computers and tech.

Do be careful to not breathe the fumes and don't handle it excessively... it can poison you the same as alcohol, or cause skin to crack and dry.


Edited by Myew
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Myew said:

Several websites seem to indicate that above 70%, isopropyl alcohol loses it's viability as a disinfectant.

Why above? I've heard the opposite- that if using a mixer for a hand sanitizer, alcohol should be at least 91% to compensate for the dilution.

 

Everclear would work well, too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lee49 said:

How to make your own DIY hand sanitizer - Trying to buy sanitizer around my area, even at the Dollar Store, is getting impossible, so why not make your own? It's simple. What I did today was went to my local grocery store ( non available of course) and bought 1 bottle of 70% isopropyl alcohol and a couple pump bottles of aloe gel. I had a near empty small pump bottle so I filled it 1/3 aloe & 2/3  alcohol, shaking it up, that's it done, with plenty left over as we run down on the already mixed bottles.The picture on the far right is the DIY bottle, simple.

20200304_124128.jpg

2020-03-04_13h07_20.png

Thanks for the recipe, Brother Lee.

Hope your 70% isopropyl alcohol isn't too weak to kill the virus...if it is, just switch to the 99% vodka. :D 

Macaw.gif.7e20ee7c5468da0c38cc5ef24b9d0f6d.gifRoss

Nobody has to DRIVE me crazy.5a5e0e53285e2_Nogrinning.gif.d89ec5b2e7a22c9f5ca954867b135e7b.gif  I'm close enough to WALK. 5a5e0e77dc7a9_YESGrinning.gif.e5056e95328247b6b6b3ba90ddccae77.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hope said:

Everclear would work well, too

Im not wasting that on my hands 

Phillipians 4:8 Finally, brothers, whatever things are true, whatever things are of serious concern, whatever things are righteous, whatever things are chaste, whatever things are lovable, whatever things are well-spoken-of, whatever things are virtuous, and whatever things are praiseworthy, continue considering these things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Myew said:

Several websites seem to indicate that above 70%, isopropyl alcohol loses it's viability as a disinfectant.
I would use 70% for disinfecting, 90%+ for cleaning computers and tech.

Do be careful to not breathe the fumes and don't handle it excessively... it can poison you the same as alcohol, or cause skin to crack and dry.

Those with Diabetes already have dry skin ... so using soap may be more beneficial. I'm saving my sanitiser for public places where soap is not available but it does dry out your skin. 

 

I have lots of Aloe Vera growing so will get some rubbing alcohol and mix the two - plus I have a kit of essential oils. 

 

I was critical of people grabbing water for a virus attack ... however, interestingly, the water pressure in some countries is going down because people are washing their hands more. Good they are listening, but may have side effect of less water.


Edited by Stormswift

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hope said:

Why above? I've heard the opposite- that if using a mixer for a hand sanitizer, alcohol should be at least 91% to compensate for the dilution.

It may be different in a mix, yes. This guide explains that IPA on its own requires water as a catalyst to kill microorganisms.

https://blog.gotopac.com/2017/05/15/why-is-70-isopropyl-alcohol-ipa-a-better-disinfectant-than-99-isopropanol-and-what-is-ipa-used-for/
"The presence of water is a crucial factor in destroying or inhibiting the growth of pathogenic microorganisms with isopropyl alcohol. Water acts as a catalyst and plays a key role in denaturing the proteins of vegetative cell membranes. 70% IPA solutions penetrate the cell wall more completely which permeates the entire cell, coagulates all proteins, and therefore the microorganism dies. Extra water content slows evaporation, therefore increasing surface contact time and enhancing effectiveness. Isopropyl alcohol concentrations over 91% coagulate proteins instantly. Consequently, a protective layer is created which protects other proteins from further coagulation.

Solutions > 91% IPA may kill some bacteria, but require longer contact times for disinfection, and enable spores to lie in a dormant state without being killed. A 50% isopropyl alcohol solution kills Staphylococcus Aureus in less than 10 seconds (pg. 238), yet a 90% solution with a contact time of over two hours is ineffective."

https://cleanroomsuppliesltd.com/blog/ipa-isopropanol-alcohol-selectioin/

Edit: I misspoke before, above 90% IPA loses practical effectiveness.


Edited by Myew
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hope said:

Why above? I've heard the opposite- that if using a mixer for a hand sanitizer, alcohol should be at least 91% to compensate for the dilution.

 

Everclear would work well, too

My store bought HS is only 70%, Doctors recommend 60% or over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/03/how-many-americans-really-have-coronavirus/607348/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark

 

Anyone who says, "Panic!" has no data to back up that comment.  Conversely, anyone who says "It's all cool, don't worry," has no data to back up that, either.  I'm really beginning to wonder if we're going to see Spanish flu-type numbers when this is all done, and I also wonder how badly various economies around the world will be hit.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Barbllm said:

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/03/how-many-americans-really-have-coronavirus/607348/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark

 

Anyone who says, "Panic!" has no data to back up that comment.  Conversely, anyone who says "It's all cool, don't worry," has no data to back up that, either.  I'm really beginning to wonder if we're going to see Spanish flu-type numbers when this is all done, and I also wonder how badly various economies around the world will be hit.  

 

The wise course is certainly the middle ground and as jw.org said listen to authorities and don't panic.

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case, I'm getting ready to take two of these:

 

80237417_CHILLPill.jpg.4487add90cbe5663d5a550e76413178f.jpg

 

and hit this in the morning:

1989059172_PanicButton.gif.f4de850c8aa17568ded8cbdce467875e.gif

 

J.K. :D 

Prayer is my preferred coping mechanism. :D 

Macaw.gif.7e20ee7c5468da0c38cc5ef24b9d0f6d.gifRoss

Nobody has to DRIVE me crazy.5a5e0e53285e2_Nogrinning.gif.d89ec5b2e7a22c9f5ca954867b135e7b.gif  I'm close enough to WALK. 5a5e0e77dc7a9_YESGrinning.gif.e5056e95328247b6b6b3ba90ddccae77.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another good article about which mask to wear.

 

FDA: N95-respirators-and-surgical-masks-face-masks


Edited by Bro Richard
CAUTION: The comments above may contain personal opinion, speculation, inaccurate information, sarcasm, wit, satire or humor, let the reader use discernment...:D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Old said:

There is something interesting going in with the Washington coronavirus infections..... No infections in Bellevue, nor Redmond where Microsoft has extensive facilities. Seattle has a huge homeless population why no infections?

Reported in the Seattle Times, Seattle has it's first known case of the coronavirus.

 I am not sying I am Superman, I am only saying that nobody has ever seen Superman  and me in a room together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be very surprised if I have my job in two weeks - direct cause - this virus. Every week is a cherry on the top right now. I know Jehovah has me though - he gave me this job - he will look after us.

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Old said:

Reported in the Seattle Times, Seattle has it's first known case of the coronavirus.

My Brother Tom lives in Renton, just outside Seattle. :( 

Macaw.gif.7e20ee7c5468da0c38cc5ef24b9d0f6d.gifRoss

Nobody has to DRIVE me crazy.5a5e0e53285e2_Nogrinning.gif.d89ec5b2e7a22c9f5ca954867b135e7b.gif  I'm close enough to WALK. 5a5e0e77dc7a9_YESGrinning.gif.e5056e95328247b6b6b3ba90ddccae77.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coronavirus is sparing children, puzzling experts:

 

Quote

As the novel coronavirus spreads around the globe, sickening more than 90,000 people and killing about 3,000, doctors have noticed something curious: Very few children have been diagnosed with it. And of those who have, most have had mild cases.

Good news for me since I am flying to Montana in a couple weeks to see my first Great Grandchild.  Since the virus is in Oregon they are a bit unnerved by it all thinking I might pick it up at the airport. 

We cannot incite if we are not in sight.___Heb.10:24,25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation with your brothers and sisters!


You can post now, and then we will take you to the membership application. If you are already a member, sign in now to post with your existing account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)