Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

DISCUSS COURT CASE HERE JW.org - Jehovah’s Witnesses Mobilize Global Response to Threat of Ban in Russia


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 1594 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LindaViktoria said:

I dont understand, can someone please explain what this means?

To say long story shortly is this:

 

Russian high court does not follow the procedures. They deny almost everything our lowers requested. It seems that court has already made up their mind to ban brothers in Russia. We will know exactly soon how it will end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The brothers had asked the Russian court to stop or delay the case so they could more time to prepare what to say.  

 

The court replied: No!  We decide today.

 

The Brothers asked if they could invite experts that can explain our literature - this is important because they are trying to say we are dangerous because of what it says in our books.  So the brothers asked if we can invite experts that can give evendience about this.

 

The Court said: No, we don't want to hear from any experts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Zacchaeus The Short said:
14:05 The court refused to involve experts in the hearing of the case.
14:06 Lawyer Zhenkov asks to involve 9 foreign legal entities representing religious associations of Jehovah's Witnesses in Europe and America to participate in the case. The reason is that the Ministry of Justice in its lawsuit asks the court to confiscate real estate objects belonging to these organizations.

thanks for keeping us up to date agape sister karen

Forgive freely as Jehovah Freely forgives us :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zacchaeus The Short said:

To say long story shortly is this:

 

Russian high court does not follow the procedures. They deny almost everything our lowers requested. It seems that court has already made up their mind to ban brothers in Russia. We will know exactly soon how it will end.

Thank you for clarifying that:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sunshine said:

The brothers had asked the Russian court to stop or delay the case so they could more time to prepare what to say.  

 

The court replied: No!  We decide today.

 

The Brothers asked if they could invite experts that can explain our literature - this is important because they are trying to say we are dangerous because of what it says in our books.  So the brothers asked if we can invite experts that can give evendience about this.

 

The Court said: No, we don't want to hear from any experts.

 

"Because we have our own experts who already told us these books are extremist"- I think this is the message behind 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, juliansan said:

"Because we have our own experts who already told us these books are extremist"- I think this is the message behind 

These "experts?"

index.jpg

Man was created as an intelligent creature with the desire to explore and understand :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14:14 The court refused to invite foreign organizations to participate in the case.
14:15 Lawyer Omelchenko declares a petition to involve eight Russian citizens as interested in participating in the case, who have been rehabilitated as victims of political repression. These people are present in the hall. Lawyers convincingly prove that if the suit is satisfied, these people from rehabilitated will turn into "extremists".
14:20 The Justice Ministry believes that the court decides on the liquidation of legal entities, this does not apply to individual citizens. In his remarks, lawyer Zhenkov recalled that such considerations were guided by the Soviet authorities, prohibiting the religion of Jehovah's Witnesses, however, repression hurt people, and as a result they were rehabilitated.
14:25 The court refuses to satisfy the petition.
2:30 pm Lawyers apply for interrogation of individual citizens, followers of the religion of Jehovah's Witnesses, who can testify about the measures taken by Jehovah's Witnesses to prevent extremist activity.
14:35 The Ministry of Justice does not object. The court satisfied.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Victoria said:

I am afraid I won't sleep tonight till the end of it. Almost 10 p m here

Anything new brought at your meeting? (that can be said in public of course).


Edited by Stormswift

<p>"Jehovah chooses to either 'reveal' or 'conceal' - cherish what he reveals and be patient with what he conceals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stormswift said:

Midnight here - don't want to sleep ... want to know outcome.

Coffee ? :drink:

Just now, Gregexplore said:

want to know outcome.

You can read it in the Revelation book... :bible2:

Man was created as an intelligent creature with the desire to explore and understand :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EverlastingLifeInView said:

I am anxiously anticipating this. Whatever happens Jehovah wills it. Praying for our brothers. 5 am here...

:heart:

14:40 Lawyers apply for interrogation as witnesses of persons recognized as victims of political repression. Ministry of Justice objects. The court refuses.
14:43 A representative of Jehovah's Witnesses, M. Novakov, makes a petition for interrogation as witnesses of persons who witnessed the falsification of evidence against believers in cases that the Ministry of Justice uses in its lawsuit as "new evidence of an offense".
14:45 To the judge's objection that these are decisions that came into force, Novakov explains that in this case a pre-judicial approach can not be used, since we are talking about different subjects of law. The court must directly investigate the evidence. Novakov tells the court about the circumstances of the flogging and false testimony in a number of Russian cities.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Linda:

 

The brothers asked: Can the Jehovah's Witnesses from America, Europe and other countries speak take part, after all the Bethel buildings  you want to take belongs to THEM?

 

The court said: No.

 

The brothers asked:  Will you let individual witnessess that have been helped by the Jehovah's Witnesses

 

The court says, no, we are only against the Watchtower organization not individual witnesses.

 

The brothers remind the court that this law will say that individual witnesses become criminals so  it is not just our Watchtower printing.

 

The court says:  Don't care, the answer is no!

 

The Brothers ask: will you let us explain what we do to make sure we don't become "extremist"

 

The court say: ok.

 

 


Edited by sunshine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Stormswift said:

Midnight here - don't want to sleep ... want to know outcome.

its 8pm here from western Australia and I totally understand how you feel, I am thinking of all our brothers and sisters in Russia and how they must be either at there meeting places wherever waiting too x

Forgive freely as Jehovah Freely forgives us :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)