Jump to content
JWTalk - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

This is Kinda Cool - No one else can put their sign on our building!


We lock topics that are over 365 days old, and the last reply made in this topic was 2142 days ago. If you want to discuss this subject, we prefer that you start a new topic.

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

With this revelation that is was illegal is even more humorous when one remembers that the city helped with the electric bill because the branch wanted to turn the lights off but the airline pilots used them for their approach for landing and complained.

 

https://tv.jw.org/#en/mediaitems/VODOrgHistory/docid-502013194_1_VIDEO

We cannot incite if we are not in sight.___Heb.10:24,25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, rocket said:

With this revelation that is was illegal is even more humorous when one remembers that the city helped with the electric bill because the branch wanted to turn the lights off but the airline pilots used them for their approach for landing and complained.

 

https://tv.jw.org/#en/mediaitems/VODOrgHistory/docid-502013194_1_VIDEO

Plus this is not the original sign from the 70s.  If memory serves the sign was updated in the 80s.  The accusation of illegality seems incorrect. 


Edited by Shawnster

Phillipians 4:8 Finally, brothers, whatever things are true, whatever things are of serious concern, whatever things are righteous, whatever things are chaste, whatever things are lovable, whatever things are well-spoken-of, whatever things are virtuous, and whatever things are praiseworthy, continue considering these things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting but I object to the suggestion that the sign was "illegal". I'm certain that if they needed permission (and the brothers knew that to be the case)  they would have sought it.  Plus the first link said they found written documents affirming the request for and approval of the sign...   I'm curious as to whether the developers Lawyers approached the brothers to ask if they had any documentation...

 

Still if it was actually illegal but the city overlooked the fact, we can chalk that up to it being Jehovah's will and he striking the city officials with a 50 year bout of blindness as with the Syrian army and Elisha.  


Edited by sunshine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Shortly after the purchase of 97 sands, before the residence was built, there were tenants in the original building that had a exhaust vent full of pigeon nests that had to be cleaned out. Since we were the landlords it was up to building maintenance to fix it. It was about 85F in the morning when we, the paint and scaffold crew, started rigging to clean it. By the time we were ready to start cleaning, dressed in our full ppe, i just happened to look in the direction of the sign and it read 98, which meant it was probably 110 on the roof we were on. 

 

Never was a fan of that time and temp clock after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About JWTalk.net - Jehovah's Witnesses Online Community

Since 2006, JWTalk has proved to be a well-moderated online community for real Jehovah's Witnesses on the web. However, our community is not an official website of Jehovah's Witnesses. It is not endorsed, sponsored, or maintained by any legal entity used by Jehovah's Witnesses. We are a pro-JW community maintained by brothers and sisters around the world. We expect all community members to be active publishers in their congregations, therefore, please do not apply for membership if you are not currently one of Jehovah's Witnesses.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

JWTalk 23.8.11 (changelog)